Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd

Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Allen & Gledhill	1 case	Jason Chan Tan Wee Meng Tan Tee Jim S C
Lam & Co	2 cases	Philip Lam

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	34.7 parties avg	4.7	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	3(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	250,476.26	83,492.093 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 2	Partial: 2 cases (200.0%)
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2007-sghc-169 02 Oct 2007	02 Oct 2007	Plaintiff	PartialDamages awarded for conspiracy and negligence. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2007-sghc-61 03 May 2007	03 May 2007	Plaintiff	PartialJudgment for Plaintiff against D Logistics, Ching Kai Huat, Clement Yip, and Mary Ting Chi Fong for sums to be determined. The amount due to the plaintiff would be $125,238.13 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2000-sghc-53 30 Mar 2000	30 Mar 2000	Defendant	PartialJudgment against the Defendant; no damages or account of profits would be ordered against the Second Defendant by virtue of Section 69(1). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.