Ng Hock Guan
Ng Hock Guan is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Ng Hock Guan has been represented by 3 law firms and 4 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Tan JinHwee, Eunice and Lim ChooEng | 2 cases |
Rodyk & Davidson LLP | 1 case |
Rodyk & Davidson | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Ng Hock Guan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.0
- Complex Cases
- 2 (50.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 16.0 parties avg |
Won | 33.3 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2009 | 16.0 parties avg |
2007 | 16.0 parties avg |
2004 | 12.0 parties avg |
2003 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Ng Hock Guan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(25.0%) |
Won | 3(75.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2009 | 1 1 |
2007 | 1 1 |
2004 | 1 1 |
2003 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
23 Jun 2009 | Respondent | LostThe court found that the Testator did not intend to leave the Estate to Sebastian absolutely as the sole beneficiary. The Testator intended to leave the Estate to Sebastian on trust for those of the Testator’s family members who are entitled to a share of the Estate pursuant to s 7, rr 2 and 3 of the Intestate Succession Act (Cap 146, 1985 Rev Ed). |
21 Nov 2007 | Defendant | WonClaims against the defendant dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
13 May 2004 | Respondent | WonThe respondent's dismissal was declared null and void, and his reinstatement was ordered, along with repayment of salary from the date of dismissal. |
17 Nov 2003 | Plaintiff | WonPlaintiff's claim for judicial review was allowed. The court ordered reinstatement and recovery of salary and allowances from the date of termination. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |