Ong Keng Tong
Ong Keng Tong is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 28.6% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Ong Keng Tong has been represented by 2 law firms and 3 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Shook Lin & Bok | 2 cases |
Shook Lin and Bok | 3 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Ong Keng Tong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.7
- Complex Cases
- 7 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 14.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 24.5 parties avg |
Won | 25.0 parties avg |
25.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2008 | 15.0 parties avg |
2005 | 24.0 parties avg |
2004 | 25.0 parties avg |
2003 | 25.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Ong Keng Tong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(14.3%) |
Neutral | 2(28.6%) |
Won | 2(28.6%) |
2(28.6%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 200.003 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2008 | 1 1 |
2005 | 2 11 |
2004 | 1 2 |
2003 | 2 11 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
24 Mar 2008 | Defendant | Unknown |
03 May 2005 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs to be paid to Jane Ong. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
18 Jan 2005 | Respondent | NeutralThe appeal was dismissed, maintaining the status quo regarding the respondent's interests in the estate. |
26 Aug 2004 | Respondent, Defendant | WonFourth respondent's application to exclude certain documents from the record of appeal was granted; costs of $600 awarded jointly to the third and fourth respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
15 Jun 2004 | Defendant | WonFourth defendant's appeal against the AR’s findings as to the amount distributed to the second defendant was dismissed. |
29 Jun 2003 | Fourth Defendant | NeutralThe First Defendant shall pay the Third and Fourth Defendants’ costs of the inquiry. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
12 Jun 2003 | Defendant | Unknown |