Peter Low LLC

Peter Low LLC is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Peter Low LLC has been represented by 3 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Peter Low & Choo LLC	1 case	Choo Zheng Xi Tang Hang Wu Elaine Low Mannar Rajkumar Raj Mannar
TSMP Law Corporation	1 case	Tang Hang Wu
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 case	Ramesh Selvaraj Hiew E-Wen, Joshua

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Peter Low LLC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	66.7%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Peter Low LLC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghc-107 16 May 2022	16 May 2022	Defendant, Respondent	LostThe court allowed the appeal against the AR’s decision to strike out the plaintiff’s Statement of Claim.
2	2018-sghc-59 15 Mar 2018	15 Mar 2018	Plaintiff, Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; order granted in terms of SUM 4476 of 2017. The Plaintiff is to file written submissions on costs within one week from the date of this judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2017-sghcr-18 12 Nov 2017	12 Nov 2017	Plaintiff	LostThe Plaintiff's application for an order that the Defendant’s interest in an immovable property be attached and taken in execution under a writ of seizure and sale was dismissed.