PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK

PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK has been represented by 2 law firms and 10 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Hing Shan Shan Blossom Allen Lye Xin Ren Rakesh Kirpalani Gopal Allen Lye Wong Su Ann Sushil Sukumaran Nair Raymond Lam Kuo Wei
Gurbani & Co.	1 case	Govintharasah s/o Ramanathan Richard Kuek Mark Chan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	66.7%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	1,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sghc-229 17 Oct 2016	17 Oct 2016	Defendant	LostStriking out application dismissed with costs fixed at $10,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Stay application dismissed in its entirety with costs fixed at $6,000 inclusive of disbursements. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2015-sghc-144 28 May 2015	28 May 2015	Defendant	LostDefendants’ application dismissed with costs fixed at $5,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2010-sghc-18 14 Jan 2010	14 Jan 2010	Defendant	WonApplication to strike out the writ of summons and set aside the warrant of arrest was granted. Costs of the action and the application awarded to the defendant, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.