Raffles Asset Management (S) Pte Ltd

Raffles Asset Management (S) Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 1 counsel. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Raffles Asset Management (S) Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 1 counsel.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
De Souza Lim & Goh LLP	1 case	Andrew Goh

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Raffles Asset Management (S) Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 4 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25.0%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25.0%
Stayed	25.0 parties avg	5.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Raffles Asset Management (S) Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Neutral	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Stayed	2(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	300,000.00	150,000.002 cases	2
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Stayed: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Stayed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghca-35 11 Oct 2022	11 Oct 2022	Defendant	StayedEMPL’s action against the first defendant, RAM, was stayed on account of an arbitration clause found in the Term Sheet.
2	2022-sghc-21 27 Jan 2022	27 Jan 2022	Defendant	LostCosts of $300,000 plus disbursements awarded against the second to fourth defendants jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2021-sghc-288 16 Dec 2021	16 Dec 2021	Defendant	NeutralThe plaintiff did not proceed against it on the ground that they were bound by an arbitration clause in the “the Term Sheet”.
4	2018-sghc-223 07 Oct 2018	07 Oct 2018	Defendant	StayedStay of proceedings granted in favour of arbitration (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).