Riverwealth Pte Ltd
Riverwealth Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Riverwealth Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 9 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Shook Lin & Bok LLP | 1 case |
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Riverwealth Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.5
- Complex Cases
- 4 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 14.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 24.0 parties avg |
Won | 16.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2016 | 14.0 parties avg |
2015 | 14.0 parties avg |
2013 | 14.0 parties avg |
2012 | 16.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Riverwealth Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(25.0%) |
Neutral | 2(50.0%) |
Won | 1(25.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2016 | 1 1 |
2015 | 1 1 |
2013 | 1 1 |
2012 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
02 Mar 2016 | Defendant | NeutralThe judgment concerns the calculation of profits and interest related to Riverwealth Pte Ltd, but does not assign a specific win/loss outcome to the company itself. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
28 Oct 2015 | Defendant | NeutralThe company's profits are subject to assessment and distribution. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
21 Jul 2013 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; misrepresentation claim rejected; oral agreement for profit sharing upheld against the company. |
06 Aug 2012 | Defendant | WonThe claims against the second defendant were dismissed. |