Sassoon Samuel Bernard

Sassoon Samuel Bernard is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Sassoon Samuel Bernard has been represented by 2 law firms and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Legal21 LLC	1 case	Toh Wei Yi Christopher Yong Shu Wei Joshua Chai Kok Keong Christopher Yong Joshua Chai
Harry Elias Partnership	1 case	Harry Elias

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sassoon Samuel Bernard's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 13.3
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	313.3 parties avg	13.3	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2007	217.5 parties avg	17.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sassoon Samuel Bernard's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2008-sgca-7 28 Feb 2008	28 Feb 2008	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2007-sghc-190 08 Nov 2007	08 Nov 2007	Defendant, Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed with costs to be taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2007-sghc-191 05 Nov 2007	05 Nov 2007	Defendant	WonThe originating summons was dismissed, and the plaintiffs were ordered to pay indemnity costs to all nine defendants.