SME Care Pte Ltd

SME Care Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

SME Care Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC	1 case	Rajaram Muralli Raja
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 case	Rajaram Muralli Raja N. Sreenivasan SC Kyle Gabriel Peters

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of SME Care Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2025	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of SME Care Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,274,200.00	4,274,200.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2025-sghc-27 18 Feb 2025	18 Feb 2025	Plaintiff	WonThe court dismissed the bankrupt's application to set aside the private trustee in bankruptcy’s partial admission of a proof of debt filed by SME Care Pte Ltd. The court agreed with the PTIB's admission of $4,274,200 of SME’s proof. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2018-sghc-96 23 Apr 2018	23 Apr 2018	Plaintiff, Appellant	PartialPlaintiff's appeal against the AR’s refusal to allow its application to enter judgment based on admission of facts under O 27 was dismissed, but the plaintiff is at liberty to enter the consent judgment under the settlement agreement.