Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Singapore Branch

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Singapore Branch is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Singapore Branch has been represented by 2 law firms and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Allen and Gledhill	1 case	Tan Chuan Thye Ang Cheng Hock Andy Yeo Edmund Eng
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 case	Siraj Omar See Hui Hui

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Singapore Branch's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	28.0 parties avg	8.0	66.7%
Neutral	18.0 parties avg	8.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2004	29.5 parties avg	9.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Singapore Branch's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Neutral	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2006-sghc-91 30 May 2006	30 May 2006	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostThe bank's appeal for production of the PWC Draft Reports was dismissed.
2	2004-sgca-38 02 Sep 2004	02 Sep 2004	Respondent	NeutralThe court ruled that it had no jurisdiction to hear the applications for the adduction of fresh evidence and directed that they be adjourned to be heard before the full Court of Appeal.
3	2004-sghc-117 03 Jun 2004	03 Jun 2004	Defendant	LostOrders in favor of Plaintiff; the court declared the assignment invalid and affirmed the plaintiff's discharge of obligations under the guarantee, entitling him to subrogation rights. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).