Swee Wan Enterprises Pte Ltd

Swee Wan Enterprises Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Swee Wan Enterprises Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	Vikram Nair Ngo Wei Shing Lim Tiong Garn Jason

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Swee Wan Enterprises Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Swee Wan Enterprises Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,395,156.62	697,578.312 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2019-sghc-149 11 Jun 2019	11 Jun 2019	Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim	PartialClaim allowed in the sum of S$1,805,156.62, less the sum of US$300,000 with the exchange rate for the conversion to be fixed on 10 September 2008, with interest at the rate of 5.33% from the date of writ to the date of judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2017-sghc-313 07 Dec 2017	07 Dec 2017	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed, and the defendant's appeal against the Assistant Registrar's decision was allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.