Tan Kin Tee
Tan Kin Tee is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Tan Kin Tee has been represented by 2 law firms and 3 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Tan Kok Quan Partnership | 1 case |
Red Lion Circle | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Tan Kin Tee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.0
- Complex Cases
- 2 (50.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Consent | 15.0 parties avg |
Partial | 13.0 parties avg |
Won | 24.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2024 | 23.0 parties avg |
2023 | 25.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Tan Kin Tee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Consent | 1(25.0%) |
Partial | 1(25.0%) |
Won | 2(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 833.333 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2024 | 2 11 |
2023 | 2 11 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
04 Dec 2024 | Respondent | PartialAppeal partially allowed. |
30 Jan 2024 | Respondent | WonThe applicant is to pay the plaintiffs a sum of $2,000 each (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
12 Oct 2023 | Plaintiff | WonCosts of $500 awarded to the second plaintiff, to be paid by Arbiters Inc Law Corporation (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
24 Aug 2023 | Plaintiff | ConsentBy consent, the plaintiffs were given leave to discontinue this suit in accordance with the terms of settlement reached between them and the 1st and 3rd defendants. |