Tan Liang Joo John

Tan Liang Joo John is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Tan Liang Joo John has been represented by 2 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP	2 cases	Chooi Jing Yen Suang Wijaya Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam Johannes Hadi
Carson Law Chambers	1 case	Ravi s/o Madasamy

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Liang Joo John's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 2 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.7 parties avg	3.7	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Liang Joo John's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,900.00	1,966.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2020-sgca-16 15 Mar 2020	15 Mar 2020	Appellant, Respondent	LostAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2019-sghc-263 05 Nov 2019	05 Nov 2019	Applicant	LostThe applicant's application for a declaration that he is not disqualified from standing for election was dismissed.
3	2019-sghc-111 28 Apr 2019	28 Apr 2019	Respondent	LostFine of SGD 5,000 imposed, with one week’s imprisonment in default. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2018-sghc-222 08 Oct 2018	08 Oct 2018	Respondent	LostConvicted for scandalising contempt under s 3(1)(a) of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016.
5	2012-sghc-109 20 May 2012	20 May 2012	Appellant	LostAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. Fined $900 in default 6 days’ imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	2009-sghc-41 17 Feb 2009	17 Feb 2009	Respondent	LostFound liable for contempt of court and sentenced to 15 days in prison.