Tan Seet Eng

Tan Seet Eng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Tan Seet Eng has been represented by 2 law firms and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Hamidul Haq Istyana Putri Ibrahim Thong Chee Kun Ho Li Fong
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Hamidul Haq Thong Chee Kun Istyana Ibrahim Ho Lifen

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Seet Eng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Seet Eng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,500.00	4,250.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2015-sgca-59 24 Nov 2015	24 Nov 2015	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; the conclusion we have reached makes it unnecessary for us to deal with two other grounds of challenge raised by the Appellant, namely, irrationality and procedural irregularity. It follows that the Appellant should be freed and the costs order made against him below should be set aside. We will hear the parties on any other issues that remain outstanding, including the question of costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2015-sghc-18 21 Jan 2015	21 Jan 2015	Applicant	LostApplication for an Order for Review of Detention was dismissed. The Applicant was ordered to pay the Attorney-General costs of $8,500, inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).