Tan Siew Tian

Tan Siew Tian is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Tan Siew Tian has been represented by 3 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Harry Elias Partnership	2 cases	Toh Wei Yi Foo Soon Yien Harry Elias
Sankar Ow & Partners LLP	1 case	Chia Soo Michael Wee Siew Ping Justin
Sankar Ow & Partners	1 case	Michael S Chia Justin Wee

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Siew Tian's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	50.0%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Siew Tian's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2008-sgca-25 23 Jun 2008	23 Jun 2008	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed with costs here and below (both the High Court and STB proceedings) and with the usual consequential orders. The decisions of the High Court and the STB were set aside and the matter was remitted to the STB for further consideration. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2008-sghc-41 18 Mar 2008	18 Mar 2008	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostThe plaintiffs' appeal against the Strata Titles Board's dismissal of their application was dismissed.