Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie

Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 14.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 14.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie has been represented by 2 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Advocatus Law LLP	1 case	Harjean Kaur Christopher Anand Daniel Ang Si Yi
L F Violet Netto	1 case	Violet Netto Colin Phan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (14.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.0 parties avg	2.0	85.7%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	14.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(85.7%)	85.7%
Won	1(14.3%)	14.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,500.00	3,100.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghc-191 12 Jul 2023	12 Jul 2023	Respondent	LostExtended Civil Restraint Order granted against the Respondent.
2	2022-sghc-247 06 Oct 2022	06 Oct 2022	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed; Ms. Ten ordered to pay costs of $8,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2022-sghc-107 16 May 2022	16 May 2022	Plaintiff, Appellant	WonThe court allowed the appeal against the AR’s decision to strike out the plaintiff’s Statement of Claim.
4	2018-sghc-158 08 Jul 2018	08 Jul 2018	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's claim for breach of contract, negligence, intimidation, and misfeasance in public office was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2015-sgca-41 12 Aug 2015	12 Aug 2015	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay $6,000 in costs (inclusive of disbursements) to the Respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2014-sghc-247 20 Nov 2014	20 Nov 2014	Plaintiff	LostOriginating Summons dismissed with costs fixed at $1,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	2014-sghc-217 28 Oct 2014	28 Oct 2014	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's appeal to include disputed sub-paragraphs in her amended statement of claim was dismissed.