The "Melati" (No 2)
The "Melati" (No 2) is a other in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 1 case in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
The "Melati" (No 2) has been represented by 1 law firm and 2 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Rajah and Tann | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of The "Melati" (No 2)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Won | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of The "Melati" (No 2)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Won | 1(100.0%) |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 1 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
14 Apr 2004 | Appellant | WonThe court held that the appeal was properly brought because the orders of Ang J were interlocutory orders and the shipowners complied with s 34(1)(c) of the SCJA. |