Thio Syn Pyn
Thio Syn Pyn is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Thio Syn Pyn has been represented by 1 law firm and 6 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Drew & Napier LLC | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Thio Syn Pyn's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 8.5
- Complex Cases
- 4 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 37.3 parties avg |
Won | 112.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2019 | 15.0 parties avg |
2018 | 28.5 parties avg |
2009 | 112.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Thio Syn Pyn's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 3(75.0%) |
Won | 1(25.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.004 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2019 | 1 1 |
2018 | 1 2 |
2009 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
26 Mar 2019 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed; costs of $28,000 (all-in) were to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
07 Aug 2018 | Respondent, Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed in part; required to buy out the plaintiffs’ shares in both MDI and THPL. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
12 Mar 2018 | Defendant | LostCourt ordered that no minority discount be applied to the sale of the plaintiff's shares in Malaysia Dairy Industries Pte Ltd. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
03 Jun 2009 | Defendant | WonJudgment for the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |