Tiah Thee Kian

Tiah Thee Kian is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Tiah Thee Kian has been represented by 1 law firm and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	2 cases	Gitta Priska Adelya Lee Pei Hua Rachel Ng Ka Luon Eddee Chin Li Yuen Marina Lynn Chew Aiping Alcina Alcina Lynn Chew Aiping

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tiah Thee Kian's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50.0%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tiah Thee Kian's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2024-sghca-7 04 Mar 2024	04 Mar 2024	Respondent	WonLuckin's application for permission to appeal against the decision of the Judge in RA 206 was dismissed. The court ordered Luckin to pay the costs of the application fixed at $7,000, inclusive of disbursements, to the Claimants collectively, and also to Credit Suisse AG individually. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2023-sghc-198 23 Jul 2023	23 Jul 2023	Claimant, Appellant	LostAppeal against the AR's order for production of documents was dismissed. Claimants to bear their own costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).