Tommy Choo Mark Go & Partners

Tommy Choo Mark Go & Partners is a partnership in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Tommy Choo Mark Go & Partners has been represented by 4 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Tommy Choo Mark Go & Partners	2 cases	Ling Leong Hui
Counsel	1 case	Bachoo Mohan Singh
instructed counsel	1 case	Singa Retnam
I.R.B Law LLP	1 case	Anil Balchandani

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tommy Choo Mark Go & Partners's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tommy Choo Mark Go & Partners's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sghcr-9 11 Jun 2017	11 Jun 2017	Plaintiff, Respondent	WonThe Defendant's application to strike out the Originating Summons was dismissed.
2	2015-sghc-239 13 Sep 2015	13 Sep 2015	Applicant, Respondent	LostTCMGP’s application in SUM 3317 was dismissed.
3	2014-sghc-79 16 Apr 2014	16 Apr 2014	Applicant, Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; Bill of Costs No 173 of 2013 be restored for taxation. Costs of this appeal to be costs to the applicant, to be fixed before me should parties fail to agree. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.