Top Ten Entertainment Pte Ltd

Top Ten Entertainment Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Top Ten Entertainment Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Allen and Gledhill	2 cases	Michael Hwang Ginny Chew
Bajwa & Co	2 cases	Bajwa Ragbir Singh
K K Yap and Partners	1 case	B Mohan Singh

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Top Ten Entertainment Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20.0%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Top Ten Entertainment Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Partial	3(60.0%)	60.0%
Won	1(20.0%)	20.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2011-sgca-11 06 Apr 2011	06 Apr 2011	Respondent	PartialCosts order of 50% in their favour upheld, but no further costs awarded for the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2010-sghc-263 30 Aug 2010	30 Aug 2010	Plaintiff	PartialThe court affirmed the Inquiry Committee’s finding that there was no agreement on fees between the plaintiff and Mr Arul, but directed the Law Society to apply to the Chief Justice for the appointment of a Disciplinary Tribunal to look into two matters. The court also ordered the Law Society to pay 50% of the plaintiff’s costs of the proceedings. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).
3	2006-sghc-1 05 Jan 2006	05 Jan 2006	Defendant, Appellant	WonTop Ten's claim for specific performance in Suit No 809 of 2004 is allowed.
4	2004-sgca-43 14 Sep 2004	14 Sep 2004	Appellant	PartialThe appeal was allowed in part regarding the arrears of rent.
5	2004-sghc-40 24 Feb 2004	24 Feb 2004	Plaintiff by counterclaim	LostTop Ten's claim for the refund of money paid as hiring charges was dismissed.