Turf City Pte Ltd
Turf City Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 57.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Turf City Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 9 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP | 3 cases |
| Rajah & Tann LLP | 2 cases |
| Rajah and Tann | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Turf City Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 9.4
- Complex Cases
- 7 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 111.0 parties avg |
| Neutral | 111.0 parties avg |
| Partial | 19.0 parties avg |
| Won | 48.8 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 111.0 parties avg |
| 2018 | 19.0 parties avg |
| 2015 | 111.0 parties avg |
| 2012 | 111.0 parties avg |
| 2009 | 18.0 parties avg |
| 2008 | 18.0 parties avg |
| 2004 | 18.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Turf City Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1(14.3%) |
| Neutral | 1(14.3%) |
| Partial | 1(14.3%) |
| Won | 4(57.1%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 94,500.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 1 |
| 2018 | 1 1 |
| 2015 | 1 1 |
| 2012 | 1 1 |
| 2009 | 1 1 |
| 2008 | 1 1 |
| 2004 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
14 Mar 2019 | Defendant | NeutralPlaintiffs did not seek costs against the fourth defendant as it was a nominal defendant. |
21 Nov 2018 | Appellant | PartialThe appellant was jointly and severally liable to pay damages in the amount of $1,338,312.50 and costs of $189,000 (inclusive of disbursements) for Civil Appeal No 168 of 2015 and the related summonses. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
05 Aug 2015 | Defendant | LostCounterclaim for bidding exercise to proceed dismissed. |
11 Nov 2012 | Defendant | WonThe defendant prevailed in the action to set aside the Consent Order (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
11 Feb 2009 | Defendant | WonDefendant's application to proceed with the bidding process for the shares was granted. |
22 Jun 2008 | Defendant | WonThe plaintiffs' application for further orders and/or clarification and/or variation of the consent order was dismissed. |
23 Feb 2004 | Defendant | WonPrayers (1) – (3) of SIC 5864 of 2003 were allowed. |