WAN WAH TONG THOMAS

WAN WAH TONG THOMAS is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

WAN WAH TONG THOMAS has been represented by 1 law firm and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Essex LLC	3 cases	S Magintharan Vineetha Gunasekaran James Liew Liew Boon Kwee Vineetha G

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of WAN WAH TONG THOMAS's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (66.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	26.0 parties avg	6.0	66.7%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of WAN WAH TONG THOMAS's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,520,000.00	760,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sghc-251 18 Oct 2017	18 Oct 2017	Defendant	LostCounterclaim dismissed; ordered to pay S$20,000 in costs to Tembusu (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2016-sgca-50 16 Aug 2016	16 Aug 2016	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; the court overturned the Judge’s findings that the Appellants were liable in the tort of deceit and that the Appellants had breached an implied term of the 2012 CLA.
3	2015-sghc-206 04 Aug 2015	04 Aug 2015	Defendant	LostJudgment against Thomas for inducing breach of contract; damages awarded in the amount of $1,500,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).