Wee Teong Boo
Wee Teong Boo is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Wee Teong Boo has been represented by 2 law firms and 8 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP | 3 cases |
Edmond Pereira Law Corporation | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Wee Teong Boo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.3
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 22.5 parties avg |
Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
Won | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2023 | 12.0 parties avg |
2022 | 13.0 parties avg |
2020 | 12.0 parties avg |
2019 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Wee Teong Boo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(50.0%) |
Partial | 1(25.0%) |
Won | 1(25.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 400.003 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2023 | 1 1 |
2022 | 1 1 |
2020 | 1 1 |
2019 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
02 Jul 2023 | Respondent | LostDr. Wee was ordered to be struck off the Register of Medical Practitioners with immediate effect. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
18 Jul 2022 | Applicant | LostApplication for leave to seek a quashing order against the Admissibility Decision was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
09 Jun 2020 | Respondent, Appellant, Applicant | WonDr. Wee's convictions on the OM Charge and the Digital Penetration Offence were overturned. |
29 Aug 2019 | Defense | PartialAccused acquitted on rape charge, but convicted of sexual assault by penetration and outrage of modesty. Ordered to pay compensation of $1,200 being the consultation costs incurred by V for psychotherapy. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |