Zrak-Teslic

Zrak-Teslic is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 12 counsels. Through 4 law firms. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Zrak-Teslic has been represented by 4 law firms and 12 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Lee Eng Beng Paul Tan Sarah Hew
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Francis Xavier SC Tng Sheng Rong Amy Seow Ang Tze Phern Joseph Lau
Gabriel Law Corporation	1 case	Gabriel Peter Govindarajan Asokan
Damodara Hazra LLP	1 case	Clement Ong Ziying Suresh Damodara

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Zrak-Teslic's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.7
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33.3%
Lost	26.5 parties avg	6.5	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2015	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2011	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Zrak-Teslic's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sgca-51 30 Aug 2016	30 Aug 2016	Appellant, Respondent	DismissedClaim to beneficial ownership in the Funds was dismissed.
2	2015-sghc-143 26 May 2015	26 May 2015	Defendant	LostThe court found that the Other Parties failed to discharge their legal burden to demonstrate their ownership.
3	2011-sghc-123 18 May 2011	18 May 2011	Other	LostThe court found that the funds were not held in trust for Zrak-Teslic. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.