Betting Act

Betting Act is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 2 cases from 2014 to 2015.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Betting Act, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Attorney-General’s Chambers50.00% success rate2 cases100.0% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate1 cases50.0% of area
Gloria James-Civetta & Co0.00% success rate1 cases50.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Betting Act, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Ng Yiwen100.00% success rate1 cases50.0% of area
Chan Tai-Hui Jason0.00% success rate1 cases50.0% of area
Nicholas Lai Yi Shin0.00% success rate1 cases50.0% of area
Mark Tay100.00% success rate1 cases50.0% of area
April Phang Suet Fern0.00% success rate1 cases50.0% of area
Foo Cheow Ming0.00% success rate1 cases50.0% of area
Tan Soo Tet100.00% success rate1 cases50.0% of area
Amarjit Singh0.00% success rate1 cases50.0% of area
Kok Li-en0.00% success rate1 cases50.0% of area
Gloria James0.00% success rate1 cases50.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 2 most recent judgments out of 2 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act OffencesHigh Court15 Jul 2015
Appeal allowed in part. The imprisonment terms for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges were replaced with an imprisonment term of four months for each of these three Proceeded Charges. The imprisonment terms for the Third Proceeded Charge and the Fifth Proceeded Charge are to run consecutively, making a total imprisonment term of eight months for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges. The fines imposed by the Sentencing Judge for all five Proceeded Charges as well as the default imprisonment terms in respect of those fines were upheld.
2Sivakumar v PP: Sexual Assault, Impersonation, and ConsentCourt of Appeal12 Mar 2014
Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against acquittal allowed.