Building Construction
Building Construction is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2010 to 2022.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Building Construction, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Legal Clinic LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Sterling Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Ramdas & Wong100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Kelvin Chia Partnership100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
R.S. Solomon LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
R. S. Wijaya & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Building Construction, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Choy Chee Yean0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Ng Hweelon0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Adrian Ee Hock Hoe100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Joanne Chew Yun Ping100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
John Chung100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Maurice Tan100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Roy Yeo Kan Kiang0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Wijaya Ravana Sivanathan0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | LZ Furniture & Decoration Pte Ltd v Uni-Flex Technology Pte Ltd: Striking Out Statement of Claim in Construction Dispute | General Division of the High Court | 15 Mar 2022 | Defendant’s appeal dismissed. |
2 | Rotol Projects v CCM Industrial: Sub-Contract Dispute over Variations & Payment for Aluminium and Glazing Works | High Court | 14 Apr 2014 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
3 | Chye Heng Huat Engineering v Concept Builders: Construction Dispute over Defective Steel Fittings | High Court | 26 May 2010 | Appeal allowed in part; judgment granted to the plaintiff for $304,458.06 with leave to defend for the remaining $85,799.87 on condition that the defendant pay the sum into court or provide a bank guarantee. |