Choy Chee Yean

Choy Chee Yean is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in performance bond and unconscionability. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and performance bond.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Erinford Injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Further and better particulars	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commission Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
On-demand bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
General Management Consultancy Services	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Choy Chee Yean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Choy Chee Yean has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	4 cases	57% of cases	Samwoh Asphalt v Sum Cheong Piling: Unconscionability in Performance Guarantee Call(Dec 2001) Liang Huat Aluminium v Hi-Tek Construction: Performance Bond Call Dispute(Nov 2001) Samwoh Asphalt v Sum Cheong: Performance Bond Dispute & Interlocutory Restraint(Jul 2001)
Breakpoint LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Samsung C&T Corp v Soon Li Heng: Performance Bond & Unconscionability under SOPA(Aug 2020)
Trenchant Law LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Hii Yii Ann v Tiong Thai King: Application for Particulars in Logging Agreement Dispute(Jun 2024)
R.S. Solomon LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	LZ Furniture & Decoration Pte Ltd v Uni-Flex Technology Pte Ltd: Striking Out Statement of Claim in Construction Dispute(Mar 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Choy Chee Yean's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	29%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Choy Chee Yean's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	500,000.00	166,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hii Yii Ann v Tiong Thai King: Application for Particulars in Logging Agreement Dispute 06 Jun 2024 Alliance Lumber (PNG) Limited (Claimant)Partial	06 Jun 2024	Alliance Lumber (PNG) Limited (Claimant): Application for Further Particulars Granted in PartThe court ordered the First Defendant to provide further particulars on several points raised by the Claimants.
2	LZ Furniture & Decoration Pte Ltd v Uni-Flex Technology Pte Ltd: Striking Out Statement of Claim in Construction Dispute 15 Mar 2022 Uni-Flex Technology Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	15 Mar 2022	Uni-Flex Technology Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedDefendant’s appeal dismissed. Costs thrown away fixed at $5,000 inclusive of disbursements. Costs in the cause would not have been appropriate where the application ought not to have been brought in the first place. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Samsung C&T Corp v Soon Li Heng: Performance Bond & Unconscionability under SOPA 16 Aug 2020 Soon Li Heng Civil Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	16 Aug 2020	Soon Li Heng Civil Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Injunction GrantedFinal injunction sought by SLH was granted.
4	Samwoh Asphalt v Sum Cheong Piling: Unconscionability in Performance Guarantee Call 04 Dec 2001 Samwoh Asphalt Premix Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	04 Dec 2001	Samwoh Asphalt Premix Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; SC Piling ordered to repay S$500,000 to ECICS, which ECICS must then repay to Samwoh. Samwoh is also entitled to interest at 4.5% per annum. (SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Liang Huat Aluminium v Hi-Tek Construction: Performance Bond Call Dispute 07 Nov 2001 Hi-Tek Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	07 Nov 2001	Hi-Tek Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's application to restrain calling on the performance bond.
6	Samwoh Asphalt v Sum Cheong: Performance Bond Dispute & Interlocutory Restraint 04 Jul 2001 Samwoh Asphalt Premix Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Jul 2001	Samwoh Asphalt Premix Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application for interlocutory restraint order deniedThe plaintiff's application for an interlocutory restraint order was denied.
7	China Women Industry Development Corporation v Singapower Development: Commission Dispute Over China Investments 22 Mar 2001 Singapower Development Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	22 Mar 2001	Singapower Development Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.