Contract of Affreightment

Contract of Affreightment is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 2 cases from 2014 to 2020.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Contract of Affreightment, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law Firm	Cases	Success Rate	Key Lawyers	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Colin Liew (1 cases) Chia Voon Jiet (1 cases) Cavinder Bull SC (1 cases)	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
PK Wong & Nair LLC100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Nair Suresh Sukumaran (1 cases) Bhatt Chantik Jayesh (1 cases) Bryan Tan Tse Hsien (1 cases)	CIMB Bank Berhad v World Fuel Services: Assignment of Rights, Debenture Authenticity & Set-Off(Jun 2020)
LVM Law Chambers LLC0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Chan Kia Pheng (1 cases) Tan Jia Hui (1 cases) Samuel Lee Jia Wei (1 cases)	CIMB Bank Berhad v World Fuel Services: Assignment of Rights, Debenture Authenticity & Set-Off(Jun 2020)
Rajah & Tann LLP100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Francis Xavier SC (1 cases) Winston Kwek Choon Lin (1 cases) Tng Sheng Rong (1 cases)	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Contract of Affreightment, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Lawyer	Cases	Success Rate	Expertise Level	Recent Cases
Colin Liew0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Chia Voon Jiet0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Nair Suresh Sukumaran100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice40% relevance score	CIMB Bank Berhad v World Fuel Services: Assignment of Rights, Debenture Authenticity & Set-Off(Jun 2020)
Francis Xavier SC100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Cavinder Bull SC0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Winston Kwek Choon Lin100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Tng Sheng Rong100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Avinash Pradhan100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Bhatt Chantik Jayesh100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice40% relevance score	CIMB Bank Berhad v World Fuel Services: Assignment of Rights, Debenture Authenticity & Set-Off(Jun 2020)
Chan Kia Pheng0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice40% relevance score	CIMB Bank Berhad v World Fuel Services: Assignment of Rights, Debenture Authenticity & Set-Off(Jun 2020)

Recent Judgments

Displaying 2 most recent judgments out of 2 total cases

No.	Title	Court	Decision Date	Outcomes
1	CIMB Bank Berhad v World Fuel Services: Assignment of Rights, Debenture Authenticity & Set-Off	High Court of the Republic of Singapore	08 Jun 2020	Claims dismissed.
2	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply	Court of Appeal	29 May 2014	Appeal allowed with costs. Contracts discharged by frustration.