Defence of payment
Defence of payment is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2015 to 2015.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Defence of payment, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Law Firm | Cases |
|---|---|
| WongPartnership LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Attorney-General’s Chambers0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| WNLEX LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Ong Ying Ping Esq0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Satwant & Associates100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Thangavelu LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Defence of payment, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Lawyer | Cases |
|---|---|
| Gordon Oh0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Hon Yi0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Tan Chee Meng100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Lee Ming Hui Kelvin0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Satwant Singh s/o Sarban Singh100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Thangavelu0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| K. Muralidharan Pillai0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Josephine Choo100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Sim Wei Na0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Charmaine Neo100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases
| No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lim Andy v Tea Yeok Kian Terence: Loan Agreement Dispute & Defence of Payment | High Court | 06 Apr 2015 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
| 2 | Public Prosecutor v Sollihin bin Anhar: Revocation of Bail and Standard of Proof | Court of Appeal | 29 Mar 2015 | Matter remitted to the State Courts for reconsideration of the prosecution’s application for revocation of bail. |
| 3 | Boustead Singapore Ltd v Arab Banking Corp: Fraud, Demand Guarantees & Unconscionability | High Court | 10 Mar 2015 | Judgment for Plaintiff; ABC is injuncted from receiving payment from Boustead under the facility agreement demand and is injuncted from making payment to BCD on BCD’s counter-guarantee demands. The event-of-default notice is invalid. |