Family Justice Rules
Family Justice Rules is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 6 cases from 2003 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Family Justice Rules, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
I.R.B Law LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
A C Shone & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Harry Elias Partnership LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Sureshan LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
G.T. Chambers0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
John Tay & Co100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Loy & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Rodyk & Davidson100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Family Justice Rules, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Natasha Choo Sen Yew0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Foo Siew Fong0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Nevinjit Singh J0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Mrs Aye Cheng Shone0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Anand George0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Grace Tan0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Tay Choon Leng John100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Philip Jeyaretnam50.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Carrie Kaur Gill100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 6 most recent judgments out of 6 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | WWM v WWN: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Divorce | General Division of the High Court (Family Division) | 04 Aug 2024 | Appeals allowed in part. |
2 | WQT v WQU: Appeal on Access Orders for Child Custody Post-Divorce | General Division of the High Court (Family Division) | 23 Jan 2024 | Appeal allowed in part; access increased to five hours but to remain supervised for 12 months; case remitted to trial judge. |
3 | WFT v WFS: Striking Out Notice of Appeal for Failure to Provide Security for Costs | General Division of the High Court (Family Division) | 06 Nov 2022 | Application dismissed. |
4 | URU v URV: Enforcing Family Court Orders via Committal Proceedings | Family Justice Courts of the Republic of Singapore | 27 Dec 2018 | Appeal allowed. The court held that leave is not required for a party to endorse a copy of a court order with a penal notice under Rule 696(4) of the Family Justice Rules, and granted the appellant leave to commence committal proceedings. |
5 | BNH v BNI: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife and Children Maintenance, Private Investigator Costs | High Court | 29 Dec 2013 | Judgment for Plaintiff in part. |
6 | Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non Conveniens | High Court | 07 Feb 2003 | Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed. |