Joinder of similar offences

Joinder of similar offences is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 4 cases from 2018 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Joinder of similar offences, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Attorney-General’s Chambers0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
WhiteFern LLC100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Providence Law Asia LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Parwani Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Law Society’s Criminal Legal Aid Scheme0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Joinder of similar offences, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Anparasan s/o Kamachi100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Jiang Ke-Yue0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Davinder Singh s/o Amar Singh SC100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Rajvinder Singh Chahal100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Sheiffa Safi Shirbeeni100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Goh Qi Shuen0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Tai Wei Shyong SC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Tan Kiat Pheng0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Kelvin Chong0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Navin Shanmugaraj Thevar100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 4 most recent judgments out of 4 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1S Iswaran v Public Prosecutor: Joinder of Charges under Criminal Procedure CodeGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore07 May 2024
Application Allowed
2-24 Apr 2022
Unknown
3Pilgrim v Asian Appraisal: Negligence in Asset Valuation and Loan SecurityGeneral Division of the High Court16 Jan 2022
Plaintiff's claims dismissed.
4PP v Mohd Ariffan: Adducing Fresh Evidence on Appeal in Sexual Offence CaseCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore13 Feb 2018
The Prosecution's application to admit the affidavits of Matin, Superintendent Chua, and Assistant Superintendent Jaga was dismissed. The application to admit the evidence of Ms. Ng was allowed in part. Ms. Ng's affidavit, section 7, and paragraphs 5.3.4 and 5.5 of the expert report are admitted as further evidence in this appeal.