Tan Kiat Pheng

Tan Kiat Pheng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 25 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and penal code. Their track record shows a 68.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated expertise across 68 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	24 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 24 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	20 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 20 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	15 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Intimidation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intermittent Explosive Disorder	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
House-trespass	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hypomanic episode of bipolar disorder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Licensing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigating factors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Possession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Power	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Sector Corruption	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causing Hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marital Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment of Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mischief by Fire	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Spousal Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntariness	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Aggravating factors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confessions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Weapons Charges	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joinder of similar offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Kiat Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Kiat Pheng has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 18 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	18 cases	72% of cases	Public Prosecutor v S Iswaran: Sentencing for Corruption Offences under the Penal Code(Oct 2024) S Iswaran v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Case Disclosure & Witness Statements(Jul 2024) S Iswaran v Public Prosecutor: Joinder of Charges under Criminal Procedure Code(May 2024)
Public Prosecutor	3 cases	12% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Leong Soy Yip: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2009) Public Prosecutor v Tay Teik Chai Robson: Culpable Homicide and Common Intention(Mar 2003) PP v Azman bin Ismail: Joint Drug Trafficking at Cascadale Condominium(Aug 2002)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	3 cases	12% of cases	Tan Wei Yi v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Grievous Hurt Conviction(Jul 2005) Gan Sim Lim v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction & Sentence for Criminal Intimidation, Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Theft(Jun 2005) Ong Sock Hung v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Intimidation and Admissibility of Evidence(May 2005)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	1 cases	4% of cases	Lim Thian Lai v PP: Admissibility of Statements & Conviction for Arms Offenses Act Violation(Nov 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Kiat Pheng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 2 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.3 parties avg	2.3	16%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	4%
Partial	32.3 parties avg	2.3	12%
Won	172.4 parties avg	2.4	68%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2003	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Kiat Pheng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(16%)	16%
Other	1(4%)	4%
Partial	3(12%)	12%
Won	17(68%)	68%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2005	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2008	2 11	Other: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2010	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 25 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v S Iswaran: Sentencing for Corruption Offences under the Penal Code 02 Oct 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	02 Oct 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialThe Prosecution's sentencing position was partially adopted by the court.
2	S Iswaran v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Case Disclosure & Witness Statements 18 Jul 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 Jul 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application UpheldThe respondent successfully defended against the application for revision.
3	S Iswaran v Public Prosecutor: Joinder of Charges under Criminal Procedure Code 07 May 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	07 May 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's contestation of the application was dismissed.
4	PP v. Rajendar Prasad Rai: CDSA Application for Restraint & Charging Orders over Suspected Criminal Proceeds 31 May 2017 Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff, Applicant)Partial	31 May 2017	Public Prosecutor (Plaintiff, Applicant): Orders Granted in PartOrders granted for restraint of specific bank accounts and charging orders on properties.
5	Public Prosecutor v Tee Fook Boon Andrew: Private Sector Corruption & Bribery in Food Supply Contracts 21 Aug 2011 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	21 Aug 2011	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was enhanced.
6	Public Prosecutor v Tay Sheo Tang Elvilin: Corruption by Police Officer 30 May 2011 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	30 May 2011	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the sentence was enhanced.
7	Teo Kok Leong Kevin v Public Prosecutor: House-Trespass and False Information Charges 19 Sep 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	19 Sep 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulThe appeal was partially successful as the sentence was reduced.
8	Arjun Upadhya v Public Prosecutor: Breach of Public Entertainment and Meetings Act for Employing Foreigners Without Valid Work Permits 29 Aug 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Aug 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe High Court upheld the District Judge's decision to convict the appellant on the four Deployment Charges.
9	PP v Ng Pen Tine: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Oct 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Oct 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction of First AccusedThe Public Prosecutor secured a conviction against the first accused, Ng Pen Tine.
10	Public Prosecutor v Leong Soy Yip: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Sep 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Sep 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe Public Prosecutor secured a conviction against both accused.
11	PP v Md Mosharaf: Culpable Homicide, Illegal Entry, Extortion, Strangulation 09 Jul 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	09 Jul 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe accused persons were found guilty of culpable homicide and immigration offences.
12	PP v Aniza bte Essa: Abetment of Culpable Homicide & Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offenders 19 Apr 2009 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	19 Apr 2009	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal to set aside the sentence of nine years’ imprisonment imposed on Aniza binte Essa and to sentence her to life imprisonment was dismissed.
13	PP v Chijioke Stephen Obioha: Drug Trafficking, Cannabis, Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Dec 2008 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Dec 2008	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused.
14	PP v Aniza bte Essa: Culpable Homicide & Sentencing for Mentally Disordered Offenders 27 Apr 2008 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Other	27 Apr 2008	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Appeal against sentenceThe Public Prosecutor appealed against the sentence of 9 years imprisonment.
15	Lim Thian Lai v PP: Admissibility of Statements & Conviction for Arms Offenses Act Violation 03 Nov 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Nov 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the conviction of the appellant.
16	Tan Wei Yi v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Grievous Hurt Conviction 11 Jul 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	11 Jul 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's case against the appellant was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, resulting in the appeal being allowed.
17	Gan Sim Lim v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction & Sentence for Criminal Intimidation, Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Theft 12 Jun 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	12 Jun 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
18	Ong Sock Hung v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Intimidation and Admissibility of Evidence 29 May 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 May 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction.
19	PP v Huang Hong Si: Culpable Homicide, Sentencing, and Mitigating Factors 10 Jul 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 Jul 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): SentencedAccused sentenced to seven years imprisonment for culpable homicide and 12 months imprisonment for causing grievous hurt, to run concurrently.
20	Public Prosecutor v Tay Teik Chai Robson: Culpable Homicide and Common Intention 02 Mar 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	02 Mar 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was sentenced to nine years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane.
21	PP v Pok Raymond: Sexual Offences Against Minors - Rape, Carnal Connection, and Fellatio 03 Feb 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Feb 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionAccused was convicted on six charges.
22	PP v Huang Rong Tai: Arson, Penal Code s 436, Admissibility of Confessions 17 Sep 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Lost	17 Sep 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Charges DismissedCharges against the accused were dismissed due to reasonable doubt. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	PP v Azman bin Ismail: Joint Drug Trafficking at Cascadale Condominium 11 Aug 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	11 Aug 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe Public Prosecutor secured a conviction against all three accused for drug trafficking.
24	PP v Yap Ah Chuan: Trafficking of Diamorphine, Misuse of Drugs Act 06 Aug 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	06 Aug 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe court found the accused guilty of trafficking in diamorphine.
25	Public Prosecutor v Ong Wee Teck: Culpable Homicide and Sentencing for Schizophrenic Offender 28 Jun 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Jun 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence of life imprisonment imposedThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment.