Malicious Prosecution

Malicious Prosecution is a primary practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 7 cases from 2012 to 2019.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Malicious Prosecution, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Attorney-General’s Chambers66.67% success rate3 cases42.9% of area
Independent Practitioner0.00% success rate2 cases28.6% of area
Providence Law Asia LLC0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Gurbani & Co LLC0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Oon & Bazul LLP100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Soh Wong & Yap0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Law Society’s Criminal Legal Aid Scheme0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Cheah Associates LLC100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Malicious Prosecution, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Yan Jun0.00% success rate2 cases28.6% of area
Low Tzeh Shyian Russell100.00% success rate2 cases28.6% of area
Khoo Boo Jin100.00% success rate2 cases28.6% of area
Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Charlene Tay Chia0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Lailatulqadriah binte Jaffar100.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Wu Lennon Leong Chong0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Sadhana Rai0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Hri Kumar Nair0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area
Abraham S Vergis0.00% success rate1 cases14.3% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 7 most recent judgments out of 7 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Malayan Banking v ASL Shipyard: Priority of Charges, Conspiracy, Malicious ProsecutionHigh Court of Singapore17 Mar 2019
Judgment for the Defendants on the claim and for the Plaintiff on the counterclaim for malicious prosecution.
2-16 Aug 2018
Unknown
3PP v Mohd Ariffan: Adducing Fresh Evidence on Appeal in Sexual Offence CaseCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore13 Feb 2018
The Prosecution's application to admit the affidavits of Matin, Superintendent Chua, and Assistant Superintendent Jaga was dismissed. The application to admit the evidence of Ms. Ng was allowed in part. Ms. Ng's affidavit, section 7, and paragraphs 5.3.4 and 5.5 of the expert report are admitted as further evidence in this appeal.
4-25 May 2017
Unknown
5Yan Jun v Attorney-General: Appeal Dismissed on False Imprisonment ClaimCourt of Appeal26 Nov 2014
Appeal dismissed.
6Yan Jun v Attorney-General: False Imprisonment, Defamation, and Limitation ActHigh Court13 Nov 2013
Appeal Dismissed
7Comfort Management v Afco East: Conversion & Wrongful Distress Claim DismissedHigh Court28 Jun 2012
Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.