Ordinary Course of Business
Ordinary Course of Business is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2015 to 2019.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Ordinary Course of Business, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases66.7% of area |
WongPartnership LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Gurbani & Co LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Oon & Bazul LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
CLASIS LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Ordinary Course of Business, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Prem Gurbani0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Govintharasah s/o Ramanathan0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Tan Ruo Yu0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Tan Chee Meng100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Lailatulqadriah binte Jaffar100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Wu Lennon Leong Chong0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Prakash Nair0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
K. Muralidharan Pillai0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Gerald Yee0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Malayan Banking v ASL Shipyard: Priority of Charges, Conspiracy, Malicious Prosecution | High Court of Singapore | 17 Mar 2019 | Judgment for the Defendants on the claim and for the Plaintiff on the counterclaim for malicious prosecution. |
2 | William Jacks v Nelson Honey: Long-Arm Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens | High Court | 15 Sep 2015 | Summons dismissed on the condition that William Jacks abandons proceedings in New Zealand if it fails to dismiss or stay proceedings there. |
3 | Boustead Singapore Ltd v Arab Banking Corp: Fraud, Demand Guarantees & Unconscionability | High Court | 10 Mar 2015 | Judgment for Plaintiff; ABC is injuncted from receiving payment from Boustead under the facility agreement demand and is injuncted from making payment to BCD on BCD’s counter-guarantee demands. The event-of-default notice is invalid. |