Rectification Costs

Rectification Costs is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 4 cases from 2010 to 2014.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Rectification Costs, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Legal Clinic LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Tito Isaac & Co LLP0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Sterling Law Corporation0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Kelvin Chia Partnership100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Premier Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Characterist LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
R. S. Wijaya & Co0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Chia Wong LLP0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Rectification Costs, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
See Chern Yang0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Dominic Chan0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Ng Hweelon0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Chia Boon Teck0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Tito Isaac0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Justin Chan0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
John Chung100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Jenna Law0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Maurice Tan100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Denyse Yeo0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 4 most recent judgments out of 4 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Ng Boo Han v Teo Boon Hiang: Construction Defect Claim & DamagesHigh Court17 Dec 2014
Appeal Allowed in Part
2Rotol Projects v CCM Industrial: Sub-Contract Dispute over Variations & Payment for Aluminium and Glazing WorksHigh Court14 Apr 2014
Judgment for Plaintiff
3Ho Pak Kim Realty v Revitech: Construction Dispute over Kovan Primera CondominiumHigh Court18 Feb 2013
Defendant's appeal allowed in part; Plaintiff's appeal dismissed.
4Chye Heng Huat Engineering v Concept Builders: Construction Dispute over Defective Steel FittingsHigh Court26 May 2010
Appeal allowed in part; judgment granted to the plaintiff for $304,458.06 with leave to defend for the remaining $85,799.87 on condition that the defendant pay the sum into court or provide a bank guarantee.