Restoration of Company Name
Restoration of Company Name is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2013 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Restoration of Company Name, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Tito Isaac & Co LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
August Law Corporation100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Alain A Johns Partnership0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
KhattarWong LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Bahvini S Law Practice0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Restoration of Company Name, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Mohamed Nawaz Kamil100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Alain Abraham Johns0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Emira binte Abdul Razakjr0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Deborah Evaline Barker0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Hewage Ushan Saminda Premaratne0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Sujatha Selvakumar0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Hariz Lee100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Shah Bahvini Jayakant0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Lye Yew Cheong v Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority: Restoration of Struck-Off Company Name | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 22 Oct 2024 | Application allowed |
2 | Re Asia Petan Organisation: Power to Restore Company Struck Off the Register | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 20 Aug 2017 | Application Granted |
3 | World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & Defamation | High Court | 09 Apr 2013 | Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1. |