Rule of Law

Rule of Law is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 2 cases from 2015 to 2015.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Rule of Law, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law Firm	Cases	Success Rate	Key Lawyers	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers0.00% success rate	2 cases100.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Jeyendran s/o Jeyapal (1 cases) Hay Hung Chun (1 cases) Tan Eu Shan Kevin (1 cases)	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act(Nov 2015) Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act Offences(Jul 2015)
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Chan Tai-Hui Jason (1 cases) Kok Li-en (1 cases)	Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act Offences(Jul 2015)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Hamidul Haq (1 cases) Istyana Putri Ibrahim (1 cases) Thong Chee Kun (1 cases)	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act(Nov 2015)

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Rule of Law, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Lawyer	Cases	Success Rate	Expertise Level	Recent Cases
Jeyendran s/o Jeyapal0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act(Nov 2015)
Hay Hung Chun0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act(Nov 2015)
Hamidul Haq100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act(Nov 2015)
Chan Tai-Hui Jason0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act Offences(Jul 2015)
Tan Eu Shan Kevin0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act(Nov 2015)
Istyana Putri Ibrahim100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act(Nov 2015)
Thong Chee Kun100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act(Nov 2015)
Nicholas Lai Yi Shin0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act Offences(Jul 2015)
April Phang Suet Fern0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act Offences(Jul 2015)
Ho Li Fong100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act(Nov 2015)

Recent Judgments

Displaying 2 most recent judgments out of 2 total cases

No.	Title	Court	Decision Date	Outcomes
1	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act	Court of Appeal	24 Nov 2015	Appeal Allowed
2	Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act Offences	High Court	15 Jul 2015	Appeal allowed in part. The imprisonment terms for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges were replaced with an imprisonment term of four months for each of these three Proceeded Charges. The imprisonment terms for the Third Proceeded Charge and the Fifth Proceeded Charge are to run consecutively, making a total imprisonment term of eight months for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges. The fines imposed by the Sentencing Judge for all five Proceeded Charges as well as the default imprisonment terms in respect of those fines were upheld.