Tortious Interference
Tortious Interference is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 8 cases from 2010 to 2014.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Tortious Interference, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Law Firm | Cases |
|---|---|
| Rajah & Tann LLP33.33% success rate | 3 cases37.5% of area |
| Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate | 3 cases37.5% of area |
| Oon & Bazul LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Gabriel Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Jimmy Yap & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| AsiaLegal LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Anthony Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| MPillay100.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Hillborne Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Raj Kumar & Rama100.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Tortious Interference, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Lawyer | Cases |
|---|---|
| Winston Kwek Choon Lin50.00% success rate | 2 cases25.0% of area |
| Koh Swee Yen100.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Cavinder Bull SC0.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Yap Neng Boo Jimmy0.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Francis Xavier SC100.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Tan Thye Hoe Timothy0.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Chia Voon Jiet0.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Peter Gabriel0.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Jimmy Yim0.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
| Colin Liew0.00% success rate | 1 cases12.5% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 8 most recent judgments out of 8 total cases
| No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SH Cogent Logistics v Singapore Agro: Conspiracy to Injure & Reinstatement Dispute | High Court | 14 Oct 2014 | Judgment for the Plaintiffs for damages to be assessed for the loss and damage caused by the Defendants’ conspiracy to injure the Plaintiffs. The Defendants’ counterclaim is dismissed. |
| 2 | Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply | Court of Appeal | 29 May 2014 | Appeal allowed with costs. Contracts discharged by frustration. |
| 3 | Indian Overseas Bank v Svil Agro: Breach of Guarantee & Enforceability of Judgments | High Court | 29 May 2014 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
| 4 | Fairview v Ong & Ong: Architectural Services Dispute & Wrongful Termination | Court of Appeal | 19 Jan 2014 | Fairview's appeal dismissed; Ong & Ong's appeal allowed. |
| 5 | Holland Leedon v C & P Transport: Warehouseman Negligence & Liability for Damaged Metal Coils | High Court | 30 Dec 2013 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
| 6 | Chua Kwee Sin v Venerable Sek Meow Di: Dispute over USD 1M Casino Investment | High Court | 28 Nov 2013 | Plaintiff's claim dismissed. |
| 7 | Antariksa Logistics v McTrans Cargo: Conversion Claim over Detained Shipping Containers | High Court | 29 Jul 2012 | Judgment for Plaintiffs |
| 8 | Bing Integrated v Eco Special Waste: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy Claims | High Court | 24 Oct 2010 | Defendants’ claims in Suit No 605 of 2006/X and Suit No 606 of 2006/B against the 1st Third Party for breach of fiduciary duties by Colonel Chua are dismissed. The consequential allegations of conspiracy between Colonel Chua, Bing Integrated and 2nd Third Party are also dismissed. |