Francis Xavier

Francis Xavier is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 30 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and legal ethics and professional responsibility. Their track record shows a 42.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 15 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Francis Xavier has demonstrated expertise across 134 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	19 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	13 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	10 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice21% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice8% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Force Majeure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shadow directors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stare Decisis	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remoteness	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Double Separability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside arbitral awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Thai Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Sale Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gross overcharging	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Market Manipulation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivatives Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Lawyers)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Convertible Bonds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Secured Convertible Note	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debenture	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proper Plaintiff Rule	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraud on the Minority	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Net Tangible Asset	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Completion Accounts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of opportunity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Secrecy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Francis Xavier has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Francis Xavier has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	13 cases	43% of cases	CBX v CBZ: Costs Dispute After Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Arbitration Awards(Oct 2020) CBX v CBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Exceeding Jurisdiction and Public Policy(Jul 2020) BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Breach of Contract & Remedies in Joint Venture Coal Briquetting Project(Jul 2017)
Rajah & Tann	9 cases	30% of cases	Susilawati v American Express Bank: Undue Influence & Banking Secrecy(Oct 2007) Ting Sing Ning v Ting Chek Swee: Derivative Action, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Fraud on Minority Exception(Oct 2007) Ting Sing Ning v Ting Chek Swee: Locus Standi in Shareholder Fraud Claim(Oct 2006)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	4 cases	13% of cases	PT Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore: Breach of Contract & Coal Supply Obligations in Joint Venture(Aug 2018) Sanum Investments v ST Group: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Tribunal Jurisdiction(Jun 2018) Nava Bharat v Straits Law: Professional Negligence & Breach of Contract in Coal Mine Acquisition(Feb 2016)
Rajah and Tann	3 cases	10% of cases	Ho Wing On Christopher v ECRC Land: Liquidator Liability for Costs in Insolvent Estate(Jan 2006) CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order(Apr 2005) ECRC Land v Ho Wing On: Directors' Duties, Unfair Preference & Joint Venture Dispute(Nov 2003)
Rajah & Tan LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Corporate Governance(Jul 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Francis Xavier's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.0
Complex Cases: 15 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	97.2 parties avg	7.2	30%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	3%
Partial	84.7 parties avg	4.7	27%
Won	139.6 parties avg	9.6	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2003	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2005	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2006	410.2 parties avg	10.2
2007	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	33.7 parties avg	3.7
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2016	216.7 parties avg	16.7
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Francis Xavier's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(29%)	29%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	8(26%)	26%
Won	13(42%)	42%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,983,500.00	116,676.4717 cases	17

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 30 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CBX v CBZ: Costs Dispute After Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Arbitration Awards 07 Oct 2020 CCA (Defendant)Won	07 Oct 2020	CCA (Defendant): Costs awardedDefendants awarded costs of S$150,000 (all-in), to be paid by the Plaintiffs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CBX v CBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Exceeding Jurisdiction and Public Policy 15 Jul 2020 CCA (Defendant)Won	15 Jul 2020	CCA (Defendant): Judgment upheldThe court upheld the arbitration award in favor of the Defendant.
3	PT Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore: Breach of Contract & Coal Supply Obligations in Joint Venture 28 Aug 2018 BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	28 Aug 2018	BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part; the question of whether BCBCS had the ability to fund KSC on its own is remitted to the Court for determination.
4	Sanum Investments v ST Group: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Tribunal Jurisdiction 17 Jun 2018 ST Vegas Enterprise Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Jun 2018	ST Vegas Enterprise Ltd (Defendant): WonSummons allowed for S.T. Vegas Enterprise Ltd.
5	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Breach of Contract & Remedies in Joint Venture Coal Briquetting Project 24 Jul 2017 Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Jul 2017	Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partThe court found that the Defendant repudiated the Joint Venture Deed. The monetary amount is set to 0.00 as the quantum of damages will be determined in Tranche 3. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Corporate Governance 28 Jul 2016 Soh Soon Jooh (Defendant)Won	28 Jul 2016	Soh Soon Jooh (Defendant): To purchase shares of plaintiffsThe court ordered the 1st to 6th defendants to purchase the shares of the plaintiffs.
7	Nava Bharat v Straits Law: Professional Negligence & Breach of Contract in Coal Mine Acquisition 25 Feb 2016 Nava Bharat (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	25 Feb 2016	Nava Bharat (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal in CA 129/2015 was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	AYK v AYM: Mareva Injunction Granted in Aid of Arbitration Enforcement 28 Dec 2015 AYM (Defendant)Lost	28 Dec 2015	AYM (Defendant): Injunction granted against the defendantThe court issued a worldwide injunction order against the defendant.
9	TMT Asia v BHP Billiton: Market Manipulation, FFAs, and Securities & Futures Act 27 Jan 2015 BHP Billiton Marketing AG (Singapore Branch) (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	27 Jan 2015	BHP Billiton Marketing AG (Singapore Branch) (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal dismissed in part, striking out order upheld in respect of the claim in the alleged tort of market manipulation.
10	Abdul Rashid v Hii Yii Ann: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Settlement Agreement 02 Oct 2014 Abdul Rashid bin Abdul Manaf (Plaintiff)Won	02 Oct 2014	Abdul Rashid bin Abdul Manaf (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffAppeal dismissed with costs.
11	Law Society v Udeh Kumar: Solicitor's Duty, Conflict of Interest & Communication with Client 27 Jun 2013 UDEH KUMAR S/O SETHURAJU (Respondent)Partial	27 Jun 2013	UDEH KUMAR S/O SETHURAJU (Respondent): Partial LossThe Respondent was found guilty of the Second and Third Charges and was suspended from practice for three months.
12	Teleoptik-Ziroskopi v Westacre Investments: Garnishee Orders and Beneficial Ownership of Funds 30 Jan 2012 Cajavec (Appellant)Partial	30 Jan 2012	Cajavec (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed to the extent that the garnishee orders absolute were set aside.
13	Law Society of Singapore v Andre Arul: Disciplinary Action for Gross Overcharging 06 Oct 2011 Andre Ravindran Saravanapavan Arul (Respondent)Lost	06 Oct 2011	Andre Ravindran Saravanapavan Arul (Respondent): SanctionedThe Respondent was fined $50,000 and censured (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Holcim v Precise Development: Force Majeure & Indonesian Sand Ban Impact on Concrete Supply 18 Jan 2011 Holcim (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	18 Jan 2011	Holcim (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs and the usual consequential orders. Application in SUM 697/2010 rejected with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Ng Swee Hua v Auston International: Breach of Contract & Damages for Failure to Issue Conversion Shares 14 Dec 2010 Ng Swee Hua (Plaintiff)Won	14 Dec 2010	Ng Swee Hua (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; damages assessed at $1,482,500 based on volume weighted average price of shares on 12 January 2007. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Rockline Ltd v Silverlink Holdings: Remedies for Failure to Issue SAP Notes 25 Aug 2010 Overseas Hotels Limited (Other)Neutral	25 Aug 2010	Overseas Hotels Limited (Other): NeutralWatching brief.
17	Law Society of Singapore v Jasmine Gowrimani: Disciplinary Tribunal Discretion & Legal Profession Act Interpretation 06 May 2010 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Lost	06 May 2010	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application DismissedThe Law Society's application was dismissed, and no order was made as to costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Susilawati v American Express Bank: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Undue Influence Claims 26 Feb 2009 American Express Bank Ltd (Respondent)Won	26 Feb 2009	American Express Bank Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent on a contractual basis.
19	Susilawati v American Express Bank: Undue Influence & Banking Secrecy 17 Oct 2007 American Express Bank Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Oct 2007	American Express Bank Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs to the defendant on a standard basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Ting Sing Ning v Ting Chek Swee: Derivative Action, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Fraud on Minority Exception 08 Oct 2007 Ting Chek Swee (alias Ting Chik Sui) (Respondent)Lost	08 Oct 2007	Ting Chek Swee (alias Ting Chik Sui) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent's position was overturned as the appeal was allowed.
21	Ting Sing Ning v Ting Chek Swee: Locus Standi in Shareholder Fraud Claim 26 Oct 2006 Gerhard Tesan Binti (Defendant)Won	26 Oct 2006	Gerhard Tesan Binti (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant, with costs to follow the event and to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Ho Wing On Christopher v ECRC Land: Liquidators' Liability for Unpaid Costs 15 Aug 2006 Nakamichi Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	15 Aug 2006	Nakamichi Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs. The liquidators are liable to compensate the appellants for the outstanding shortfall. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Discharge of Anton Piller & Mareva Injunctions for Fraud & Asset Dissipation 21 Mar 2006 Karma International SARL (Plaintiff)Partial	21 Mar 2006	Karma International SARL (Plaintiff): Mareva injunction dischargedMareva injunction discharged in respect of Esys, Goel and Karma Singapore.
24	Ho Wing On Christopher v ECRC Land: Liquidator Liability for Costs in Insolvent Estate 25 Jan 2006 Cafe Al Fresco Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	25 Jan 2006	Cafe Al Fresco Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for liquidators to be personally liable for shortfall in costs was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
25	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order 25 Apr 2005 Karma International SARL (Plaintiff)Partial	25 Apr 2005	Karma International SARL (Plaintiff): Application allowed in partApplication for fortification of undertakings as to damages allowed in part for the third defendant only.
26	ECRC Land v Ho Wing On: Directors' Duties, Unfair Preference & Joint Venture Dispute 26 Nov 2003 Cafe Al Fresco Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	26 Nov 2003	Cafe Al Fresco Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against the defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Leow Tiak Cheow v Pan-United Industries: Breach of Warranty in Share Sale Agreement 27 Oct 2002 Pan-United Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Oct 2002	Pan-United Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim is dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Irawan Darsono v Ong Soon Kiat: Enforceability of Illegal Share Purchase Agreement under Securities Industry Act 25 Jun 2002 Ong Soon Kiat (Defendant)Won	25 Jun 2002	Ong Soon Kiat (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiffs' action was dismissed with costs.
29	Sutjiawang Johanis v Tjia Eng Soei: Claim for Monies Lent and Shares 29 Apr 2002 Tjia Eng Soei (Defendant)Lost	29 Apr 2002	Tjia Eng Soei (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim was dismissed.
30	Sim Yew Thong v Ng Loy Nam Thomas: Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Penal Code Interpretation 10 Sep 2000 Sim Yew Thong (Appellant)Partial	10 Sep 2000	Sim Yew Thong (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowedAppeal against conviction dismissed. Sentence of two weeks' imprisonment commuted to a fine of $1000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).