Chia Ee Lin Evelyn

Chia Ee Lin Evelyn is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Chia Ee Lin Evelyn has been represented by 3 law firms and 9 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chia Ee Lin Evelyn's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
8.6
Complex Cases
5 (100.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost111.0 parties avg
Partial211.0 parties avg
Won25.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
200539.0 parties avg
200415.0 parties avg
2002111.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chia Ee Lin Evelyn's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost1(20.0%)
Partial2(40.0%)
Won2(40.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD82,597.365 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20052
21
20041
1
20021
1

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
22 Aug 2005
Respondent, AppellantPartialAppeal allowed in part, damages awarded in the sum of $3,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
05 Apr 2005
RespondentWonAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22 Feb 2005
PlaintiffPartialGeneral damages awarded in the sum of $1,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) for loss of amenity and enjoyment of a premier club.
01 Sep 2004
PlaintiffWonJudgment for the plaintiff on her claims, as verified later. The amount owing to the plaintiff is $408,986.82. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21 Nov 2002
PlaintiffLostClaim for misrepresentation and breach of contract dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).