Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd

Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 18 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 20 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 11.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 38.9% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 20 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	Lim Dao Kai Tay Yong Seng Ang Cheng Hock William Ong Kristy Tan Ramesh Selvaraj Muthu Arusu K Shanmugam K Shanmugam SC
Allen & Gledhill	1 case	Sanjiv Rajan Boey Swee Siang Stanley Lai K Shanmugam Marcus Yip K Shanmugam SC Candace Ler
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	1 case	Mary-Anne Shu-Hui Chua Benny Jude Philomen
Allen and Gledhill	2 cases	Andrew Chan Stanley Lai Andrew Yeo M Reza K Shanmugam K Shanmugam SC Candace Ler Ler Min Hui Candace

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 7 (38.9%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	75.4 parties avg	5.4	38.9%
Neutral	43.0 parties avg	3.0	22.2%
Partial	54.8 parties avg	4.8	27.8%
Won	26.5 parties avg	6.5	11.1%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2010	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2008	35.3 parties avg	5.3
2005	55.6 parties avg	5.6
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	35.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(38.9%)	38.9%
Neutral	4(22.2%)	22.2%
Partial	5(27.8%)	27.8%
Won	2(11.1%)	11.1%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	1,428.577 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 3	Neutral: 3 cases (300.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 12	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	3 311	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 21	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 18 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2021-sgca-67 01 Jul 2021	01 Jul 2021	Respondent, Defendant	NeutralRTC did not take an active part in the Cross Applications.
2	2020-sghc-229 25 Oct 2020	25 Oct 2020	Defendant	NeutralThe second defendant was absent. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2020-sghc-158 26 Jul 2020	26 Jul 2020	Defendant	NeutralThe court ordered that the plaintiff should procure the second defendant to reimburse the first defendant for the Fees that she had paid on behalf of the second defendant.
4	2020-sghc-155 22 Jul 2020	22 Jul 2020	Defendant	NeutralThe interests of the second defendant in OS 1446 are also not compromised.
5	2012-sgca-62 30 Oct 2012	30 Oct 2012	Appellant, Plaintiff	LostRTC's appeal against the dismissal of its claims against the former directors was dismissed.
6	2010-sghc-291 29 Sep 2010	29 Sep 2010	Plaintiff	LostRTC's claims against the Defendants were dismissed in their entirety. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2008-sghc-141 25 Aug 2008	25 Aug 2008	Plaintiff	LostAppeal against order for discovery of documents was dismissed.
8	2008-sghc-46 31 Mar 2008	31 Mar 2008	Applicant	PartialThe court declared that section 79(3) does not prevent a party from seeking judicial review and that Mr. Chew had a connection with the Club that could give rise to questions concerning his impartiality.
9	2008-sghc-28 26 Feb 2008	26 Feb 2008	Plaintiff	PartialAppeal dismissed except for variations to paragraphs 14 and 46.
10	2005-sghc-198 19 Oct 2005	19 Oct 2005	Applicant	LostThe company's application to extend the timelines for the consideration of the scheme proposal and the convening of the meeting to discuss the scheme was dismissed.
11	2005-sghc-178 21 Sep 2005	21 Sep 2005	Respondent	WonApplications for the appointment of a special receiver and manager, to restrain the Club from dealing with its assets, and for liberty to examine the officers and directors of the Club were dismissed.
12	2005-sghc-173 14 Sep 2005	14 Sep 2005	Defendant	LostThe Club's application faced a setback as the litigant-members' application to set aside the orders was dismissed on a preliminary point.
13	2005-sgca-40 22 Aug 2005	22 Aug 2005	Appellant, Respondent	PartialAppeal allowed in part, with no compensation under the second head of claim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	2005-sghc-38 22 Feb 2005	22 Feb 2005	Defendant	LostJudgment against the defendant; damages awarded to the plaintiffs in the total amount of $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	2003-sgca-27 10 Aug 2003	10 Aug 2003	Respondent	LostAppeal allowed; found in breach of contract.
16	2002-sghc-278 21 Nov 2002	21 Nov 2002	Defendant	WonClaims for misrepresentation and breach of contract dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	2002-sgca-35 15 Jul 2002	15 Jul 2002	Respondent	PartialAppeal dismissed in part, as the appeal was allowed only in respect of the documents under item 10. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	2002-sghc-110 19 May 2002	19 May 2002	Defendant, Appellant	PartialAppeal allowed in part, limiting the scope of discovery.