Toh Kian Sing

Toh Kian Sing is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 65 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and bills of lading act. Their track record shows a 48.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 12% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated expertise across 145 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	54 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 54 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	29 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 29 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	28 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 28 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	23 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 23 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	23 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 23 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	20 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 20 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	14 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	14 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	11 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	11 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	11 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	10 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	9 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	9 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	8 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	7 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Slot Charterparty	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Customer Confidentiality	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Examination of judgment debtor	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Escrow Agreements	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collections	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conversion	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cargo Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Costs against non-party	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint and several liability for costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of full and frank disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ship Leasing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Renunciation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Novation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cargo Operations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Delivery of cargo against presentation of bills of lading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voyage charterparties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Marine Bunker Fuel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misdelivery of Cargo	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Time Bar Defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drilling Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Port Operations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fuel Oil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Title to Sue	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lawful Holder	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Order Bills of Lading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Delivery of Cargo	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Curial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Customs Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Directors and Officers Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reinsurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Secrecy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Substituted Service	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting Standards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction and Arrest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Switch Bills of Lading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Demurrage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Condition Precedent	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letters of Indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Comity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Toh Kian Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Toh Kian Sing has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 21 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	21 cases	32% of cases	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: En Bloc Sale, Priority of Proceeds & Costs(Aug 2024) Kiri Industries v Senda International: Oppression Remedy, En Bloc Share Sale(May 2024) Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Examination Order Dispute(Mar 2024)
Rajah & Tann LLP	18 cases	28% of cases	Hai Jiang v. Singapore Technologies Marine: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration of Crane Upgrade Dispute(Jan 2020) Abani Trading v BNP Paribas: Letter of Credit Compliance & Bank's Duty of Care(Jun 2014) Burgundy Global v Transocean: Damages for Breach of Contract & EJD Order Jurisdiction(May 2014)
Rajah & Tann	18 cases	28% of cases	Swift-Fortune Ltd v Magnifica Marine SA: Mareva Injunction & Foreign Arbitration(Nov 2006) Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v Fujitrans: Discovery Application & Issue Estoppel(Nov 2006) UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation: Title to Sue Under Bills of Lading Act(Aug 2004)
Rajah and Tann	8 cases	12% of cases	Korea Exchange Bank v Standard Chartered Bank: Letter of Credit Discrepancies and UCP 500 Interpretation(Nov 2005) UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation: Title to Sue on Bills of Lading under Bills of Lading Act(Sep 2005) Standard Chartered Bank v Korea Exchange Bank: Construction of Letters of Credit & Admissibility of Expert Evidence(Apr 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Toh Kian Sing's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 8 (12%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	193.0 parties avg	3.0	29%
Neutral	22.5 parties avg	2.5	3%
Partial	122.9 parties avg	2.9	18%
Stayed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	2%
Won	322.4 parties avg	2.4	49%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	72.4 parties avg	2.4
2003	62.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	52.2 parties avg	2.2
2011	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	44.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	53.6 parties avg	3.6
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2024	33.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Toh Kian Sing's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	19(29%)	29%
Neutral	2(3%)	3%
Partial	12(18%)	18%
Stayed	1(2%)	2%
Won	32(48%)	48%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
KRW	1,890,126,589.00	1,890,126,589.001 cases	1
SGD	15,968,665.27	483,898.9533 cases	33
USD	127,800,828.15	25,560,165.635 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2002	7 115	Lost: 1 cases (14.3%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 5 cases (71.4%)
2003	6 312	Lost: 3 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 2 cases (33.3%)
2004	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2005	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	5 41	Partial: 4 cases (80.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2011	4 13	Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2012	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Stayed: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2021	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 2 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 65 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: En Bloc Sale, Priority of Proceeds & Costs 28 Aug 2024 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Lost	28 Aug 2024	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Unsuccessful in costs applicationSenda to pay Kiri costs in the sum of S$360,050.
2	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Oppression Remedy, En Bloc Share Sale 19 May 2024 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Partial	19 May 2024	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Balance of proceeds from en bloc sale after Kiri Industries receives US$603.8mSenda International Capital Ltd will receive the remaining proceeds from the en bloc sale of shares in DyStar after Kiri Industries Ltd receives US$603.8 million.
3	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Examination Order Dispute 26 Mar 2024 Fan Jing (Other)Lost	26 Mar 2024	Fan Jing (Other): LostThe challenge to the EJD order is not successful; it stands.
4	COSCO Shipping v PT OKI Pulp: Jurisdiction in Limitation Action for Vessel-Jetty Contact 21 May 2023 COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, Ltd (Claimant)Won	21 May 2023	COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, Ltd (Claimant): Application DismissedThe application by the first defendant was dismissed.
5	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in Oppression Case 07 Feb 2023 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Lost	07 Feb 2023	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Unfavorable determination of infringing product quantityCourt rejected Senda's expert opinion on the quantity of infringing products.
6	Senda International Capital Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd: Minority Oppression & Costs Assessment in SICC 24 Nov 2022 Senda International Capital Ltd (Appellant)Lost	24 Nov 2022	Senda International Capital Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedSenda's appeal against the costs judgment was dismissed.
7	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Costs Against Non-Party 26 Dec 2021 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Won	26 Dec 2021	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Application deniedApplication to make Longsheng jointly and severally liable for Senda's costs was denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 07 Dec 2021 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Lost	07 Dec 2021	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Costs to be paidSenda International Capital Ltd to pay costs of S$4,960,815.26 and disbursements of S$3,100,826.85 to Kiri Industries Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Sinopec v Bank of Communications: Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens in Letter of Credit Dispute 27 Oct 2021 Sinopec International (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Oct 2021	Sinopec International (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Applications by Defendant DismissedDefendant's applications challenging jurisdiction and seeking a stay of proceedings were dismissed.
10	Phillips 66 v Owner of Vessel “LUNA”: Bills of Lading, Contract of Carriage, Wrongful Arrest 19 Aug 2021 Phillips 66 International Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	19 Aug 2021	Phillips 66 International Trading Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal LostAppeal lost; ordered to pay costs to the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation & Oppression 02 Jun 2021 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Lost	02 Jun 2021	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Shares to be purchasedSenda International Capital Ltd was ordered to purchase Kiri Industries Ltd's shares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share Valuation 20 Dec 2020 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Lost	20 Dec 2020	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Order to purchase sharesSenda International Capital Ltd was ordered to purchase Kiri Industries Ltd’s shares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Hai Jiao v Yaw Chee Siew: Contractual Obligations and Best Endeavours in Ship Leasing 12 Jul 2020 Hai Jiao 1307 Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	12 Jul 2020	Hai Jiao 1307 Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $6,679,114 (assumed USD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Senda International Capital v Kiri Industries: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 11 Feb 2020 Senda International Capital Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim, Defendant)Partial	11 Feb 2020	Senda International Capital Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim, Defendant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed on the Minority Discount Issue, and allowed in part on the Costs Issue.
15	Hai Jiang v. Singapore Technologies Marine: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration of Crane Upgrade Dispute 23 Jan 2020 Hai Jiang 1401 Pte. Ltd. (Plaintiff)Won	23 Jan 2020	Hai Jiang 1401 Pte. Ltd. (Plaintiff): Anti-Suit Injunction GrantedThe court granted an anti-suit injunction restraining Singapore Technologies Marine Ltd from maintaining the arrest of the vessel through the Sharjah Proceedings.
16	Cosco Nantong v Logitel: Pre-Action Discovery & Abuse of Process 28 Nov 2019 Cosco Nantong Shipyard Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 Nov 2019	Cosco Nantong Shipyard Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Summons dismissed with costsSummons 3934 of 2019 dismissed with costs to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	OCBC v Owner of "Yue You 902": Bills of Lading, Delivery of Cargo, and Summary Judgment 23 Apr 2019 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	23 Apr 2019	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissed; summary judgment affirmedRegistrar's Appeals dismissed; summary judgment affirmed for USD 7,454,973.16, with interest of 5.33% per annum from date of writ to date of judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Shanghai Turbo v Liu Ming: Setting Aside Service Order & Interim Injunctions 29 Jul 2018 Liu Ming (Defendant)Won	29 Jul 2018	Liu Ming (Defendant): Application to set aside service order grantedApplication to set aside service order and interim injunctions allowed. Costs of $20,000 with reasonable disbursements to be paid by Shanghai Turbo to Mr Liu. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Phillips 66 v Star Quest: Bills of Lading & Title in Bunker Supply Contracts after OW Bunker Insolvency 19 May 2016 Phillips 66 International Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	19 May 2016	Phillips 66 International Trading Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
20	Big Port Service DMCC v Owner of Vessel “XIN CHANG SHU”: Leave to Appeal Wrongful Arrest Order 17 May 2016 Owner of the vessel “XIN CHANG SHU” (Defendant)Won	17 May 2016	Owner of the vessel “XIN CHANG SHU” (Defendant): WonThe defendant's application to set aside the NOA was successful. The plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendant’s costs which was fixed at $10,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Big Port Service DMCC v Xin Chang Shu: Wrongful Arrest & Agency in Bunker Supply 03 Dec 2015 Big Port Service DMCC — Owner of the vessel(s) "Xin Chang Shu" (Defendant, Appellant)Won	03 Dec 2015	Big Port Service DMCC — Owner of the vessel(s) "Xin Chang Shu" (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedDefendant's appeal allowed and awarded costs of $10,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Big Port Service DMCC v China Shipping: Wrongful Arrest & Agency in Bunker Supply Dispute 10 Aug 2015 CHINA SHIPPING CONTAINER LINES (Defendant)Partial	10 Aug 2015	CHINA SHIPPING CONTAINER LINES (Defendant): Application Allowed in PartThe Defendant's application to strike out the claim was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Abani Trading v BNP Paribas: Letter of Credit Compliance & Bank's Duty of Care 05 Jun 2014 BNP Paribas (Defendant, Respondent)Won	05 Jun 2014	BNP Paribas (Defendant, Respondent): Costs awarded on an indemnity basisBNP Paribas was awarded costs on an indemnity basis. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
24	Burgundy Global v Transocean: Damages for Breach of Contract & EJD Order Jurisdiction 13 May 2014 Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd (Respondent)Partial	13 May 2014	Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd (Respondent): Partial JudgmentPartial judgment for Transocean; damages awarded in the amount of $55,001.46 (assumed USD, as the judgment refers to US dollar amounts and the respondent is listed on the New York Stock Exchange).
25	Portigon v The "Titan Unity": Joinder of Third Parties and Consolidation of Disputes in International Arbitration 03 Feb 2014 The "Titan Unity" (Plaintiff)Lost	03 Feb 2014	The "Titan Unity" (Plaintiff): Application to set aside and strike out the writ is dismissedApplication to set aside and strike out the writ is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	The Nasco Gem: Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Arrest Warrant 06 Jan 2014 The "Nasco Gem" (Applicant, Defendant)Lost	06 Jan 2014	The "Nasco Gem" (Applicant, Defendant): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to file a notice of appeal was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	The "Titan Unity": Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration for Misdelivery of Cargo Claim 18 Dec 2013 The "Titan Unity" (Plaintiff)Stayed	18 Dec 2013	The "Titan Unity" (Plaintiff): Action StayedPlaintiff's action against Oceanic is stayed in favor of arbitration at the Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration, with the arrested vessel retained as security.
28	Transocean v Burgundy: Breach of Escrow Agreement & Damages for Loss of Drilling Contract Profits 20 Jun 2013 Transocean Offshore International Ventures Limited (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	20 Jun 2013	Transocean Offshore International Ventures Limited (Plaintiff, Respondent): Damages awarded; appeal dismissed in partDamages awarded in the sum of US$105,536,922 plus interest, varied to limit cold-stacking expenses to the minimum hire period. The currency is specified in the judgment.
29	Zweite Ms “Philippa Schulte” v PSA Corp: Negligence Claim over Damaged Hatch Cover 27 Jun 2012 PSA Corp Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	27 Jun 2012	PSA Corp Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim WithdrawnCounterclaim withdrawn. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30	Hanwha Non-Life Insurance v Alba Pte Ltd: Reinsurance Contract Dispute over Fire Loss 29 Dec 2011 Hanwha Non-Life Insurance Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Dec 2011	Hanwha Non-Life Insurance Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPlaintiff is entitled to 45% of the total loss suffered by Dae Hye (minus scrap value and insurance deductible) amounting to KRW1,890,126,589.
31	Prestige Marine v Marubeni: Setting Aside Arbitration Award & Leave to Appeal on SGA s50(3) Damages 29 Dec 2011 Marubeni International Petroleum (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	29 Dec 2011	Marubeni International Petroleum (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Application dismissedApplication by Prestige Marine Services Pte Ltd to set aside an arbitration award in favour of Marubeni International Petroleum (S) Pte Ltd and for leave to appeal on four questions of law was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	Valency International Trading v Alton International Resources: Contract Law & Breach 11 May 2011 Alton International Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Neutral	11 May 2011	Alton International Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Statement of Claim to be determined at trialStatement of claim cannot be said to contain no cause of action until the point of law is determined. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
33	Valency International Trading v Alton International Resources: Contract Law, Anticipatory Breach, and Condition Precedent 02 Mar 2011 Alton International Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	02 Mar 2011	Alton International Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe defendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's statement of claim was granted, and the plaintiff's action was dismissed. No monetary amount was awarded to the defendant.
34	ANL Singapore Ltd v The “Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34”: Stay of Proceedings for Foreign Arbitration 24 Oct 2010 ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	24 Oct 2010	ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partThe appeal against setting aside the service of the Writ of Summons was allowed, but the appeal against the stay of proceedings in favor of foreign arbitration was dismissed.
35	ANL Singapore Ltd v The “Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39”: Dispute over Slot Charterparty Agreement and Foreign Arbitration 24 Oct 2010 ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	24 Oct 2010	ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part as the decision to set aside the Writ of Summons was overruled, but the stay of proceedings in favor of foreign arbitration was affirmed.
36	ANL Singapore Ltd v The "Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34": Arrest of Vessel & Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 18 Oct 2010 ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	18 Oct 2010	ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal against setting aside the arrest of the vessel was allowed, but the stay of proceedings in favor of arbitration was affirmed.
37	ANL Singapore Ltd v The "Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39": Admiralty Claim, Beneficial Ownership & Arbitration 18 Oct 2010 ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	18 Oct 2010	ANL Singapore Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against the Assistant Registrar’s decision to set aside the writs and the arrest of the vessel was allowed. The appeal against his decision to stay the proceedings in favour of foreign arbitration was dismissed.
38	Transocean v Burgundy: Dispute over Escrow Agreement & Arbitration Clause in Drilling Contract 27 Jan 2010 Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	27 Jan 2010	Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedPlaintiff's appeal allowed with costs fixed at $12,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Costs ordered below were set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
39	Alliance Concrete v Comfort Resources: Breach of Contract & Termination Dispute 27 Jul 2009 Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	27 Jul 2009	Alliance Concrete Singapore Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs. Damages to the Appellant should be assessed based on 30,000mt of sand per month. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
40	Swift-Fortune Ltd v Magnifica Marine SA: Mareva Injunction & Foreign Arbitration 30 Nov 2006 Swift-Fortune Ltd (Appellant)Lost	30 Nov 2006	Swift-Fortune Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of Judith Prakash J was dismissed with costs.
41	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v Fujitrans: Discovery Application & Issue Estoppel 28 Nov 2006 Banque Cantonale Vaudoise (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	28 Nov 2006	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
42	Korea Exchange Bank v Standard Chartered Bank: Letter of Credit Discrepancies and UCP 500 Interpretation 28 Nov 2005 Standard Chartered Bank (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	28 Nov 2005	Standard Chartered Bank (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffSummary judgment granted for US$1,961,430.67 together with interest and costs.
43	UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation: Title to Sue on Bills of Lading under Bills of Lading Act 13 Sep 2005 Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	13 Sep 2005	Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Respondent): Original Action Struck OutThe original action against the respondent was struck out in the High Court, but this decision was overturned on appeal.
44	Standard Chartered Bank v Korea Exchange Bank: Construction of Letters of Credit & Admissibility of Expert Evidence 13 Apr 2005 Standard Chartered Bank (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	13 Apr 2005	Standard Chartered Bank (Respondent, Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication by Standard Chartered Bank dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
45	UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation: Title to Sue Under Bills of Lading Act 04 Apr 2005 Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	04 Apr 2005	Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by the plaintiff was dismissed with costs.
46	UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation: Title to Sue Under Bills of Lading Act 24 Aug 2004 Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	24 Aug 2004	Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed UCO Bank's claim and awarded costs to Golden Shore.
47	Mizuho Corporate Bank v Cho Hung Bank: Forum Non Conveniens & Letter of Credit Dispute 30 Jul 2004 Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd (Respondent)Won	30 Jul 2004	Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. No monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
48	Tao Commodity Trader Inc v Fortis Bank: Service of Writ on Foreign Company 18 Feb 2004 Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V. (Defendant, Applicant)Won	18 Feb 2004	Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V. (Defendant, Applicant): Application allowedThe application to set aside the service of writ was allowed.
49	UCO Bank v Golden View Maritime: Mareva Injunction & Dissipation of Assets 30 Oct 2003 Golden View Maritime Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Oct 2003	Golden View Maritime Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application AllowedThe Defendants' application to set aside the injunction was allowed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
50	Golden Shore Transportation v UCO Bank: Stay of Proceedings & Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause 22 Oct 2003 Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	22 Oct 2003	Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
51	Sin Heng Long Metal v An Ji Jiang: Voyage Charterparty Dispute over Vessel Inspection and Contract Termination 28 Sep 2003 An Ji Jiang (Defendant)Partial	28 Sep 2003	An Ji Jiang (Defendant): Rectification of Fixture Note GrantedThe defendants' counterclaim for rectification of the fixture note was allowed.
52	UCO Bank v Golden Shore Transportation: Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause & Forum Non Conveniens 24 Jun 2003 Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	24 Jun 2003	Golden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Stay of action soughtGolden Shore Transportation Pte Ltd sought a stay of action, but the appeal was allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
53	UCO Bank v Golden Orient Maritime: Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause & Forum Non Conveniens 24 Jun 2003 Golden Orient Maritime Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	24 Jun 2003	Golden Orient Maritime Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal was dismissed.
54	Sinogreat v Hin Leong: Breach of Contract & Cargo Confiscation Dispute 13 Apr 2003 Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd (Defendant)Won	13 Apr 2003	Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendants' counterclaims are allowed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
55	Beam Technology v Standard Chartered: Letter of Credit Dispute over Forged Air Waybill 09 Dec 2002 Standard Chartered Bank (Respondent)Lost	09 Dec 2002	Standard Chartered Bank (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the judgment in their favor was set aside.
56	Bandung Shipping v Keppel Tatlee: Rights of Suit Under Bills of Lading Act 29 Oct 2002 Bandung Shipping Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Won	29 Oct 2002	Bandung Shipping Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, restoring the decision of the Deputy Registrar striking out the entire statement of claim and the action.
57	The Rainbow Spring: Admiralty Action, Wrongful Arrest, and Non-Disclosure of Material Facts in Charterparty Dispute 28 Oct 2002 Rainbow Spring Shipping Limited Inc (Defendant)Won	28 Oct 2002	Rainbow Spring Shipping Limited Inc (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe Defendant's appeal was allowed; the Plaintiff is to pay the Defendant the costs of the appeal fixed at $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
58	PSA Corp Ltd v Korea Exchange Bank: Banking Secrecy & Disclosure of Customer Information 25 Apr 2002 Korea Exchange Bank (Defendant, Respondent)Won	25 Apr 2002	Korea Exchange Bank (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal, effectively ruling in favor of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
59	Beam Technology v Standard Chartered: Letter of Credit, Forgery & Bank's Duty 24 Mar 2002 Standard Chartered Bank (Respondent, Defendant)Won	24 Mar 2002	Standard Chartered Bank (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantThe defendant successfully defended the appeal, with the court ruling in their favor.
60	Keppel Tatlee Bank v Bandung Shipping: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Contract of Carriage 08 Mar 2002 Bandung Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	08 Mar 2002	Bandung Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal Partially LostAppeal partially lost; the appeal against the claim being struck out was allowed in part. The order for costs below was set aside (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
61	Tapematic SpA v Wirana Pte Ltd: Agency Law & Misrepresentation in Letter of Credit Transaction 08 Jan 2002 Wirana Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	08 Jan 2002	Wirana Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Application to Strike Out GrantedApplication to strike out parts of the Amended Statement of Claim granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
62	Everbright v AXA: Marine Insurance & Institute Classification Clause Dispute 11 Apr 2001 Everbright Commercial Enterprises Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	11 Apr 2001	Everbright Commercial Enterprises Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Everbright to pay two-thirds of AXA's costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
63	Credit Agricole Indosuez v Banque Nationale de Paris: Restitution with Interest on Reversed Judgment 05 Apr 2001 Credit Agricole Indosuez (Appellant)Won	05 Apr 2001	Credit Agricole Indosuez (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; BNP ordered to refund US$1,378,360.02 plus interest at 6% per annum from the date of receipt of the judgment sum to the date of the Court of Appeal's judgment.
64	Credit Agricole Indosuez v Banque Nationale de Paris: Letter of Credit Construction & UCP Rules 13 Feb 2001 Credit Agricole Indosuez (Appellant)Won	13 Feb 2001	Credit Agricole Indosuez (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal of Credit Agricole Indosuez was allowed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
65	Mizuho Corporate Bank v Woori Bank: Letter of Credit Dispute over 51-Day Negotiation Clause 08 Apr 2000 Mizuho Corporate Bank Limited (Plaintiff)Won	08 Apr 2000	Mizuho Corporate Bank Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the monetary amount was not specified in the judgment, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.