Teo Sew Eng v Public Prosecutor: Aiding and Abetting Mischief by Fire in Family Dispute
In Teo Sew Eng v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of Singapore reviewed the sentence of Teo Sew Eng, who was convicted of aiding and abetting her son in committing mischief by fire. The case arose from a family dispute over withheld funds. The High Court, while acknowledging the seriousness of the offense, reduced Teo Sew Eng's imprisonment term from six months to two months, considering the probation sentences given to the principal offenders and the context of the family dispute.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Appeal allowed in part
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment reserved
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Teo Sew Eng was convicted of aiding and abetting her son's mischief by fire due to a family dispute. The High Court reduced her sentence from six to two months.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Prosecutor | Respondent | Government Agency | Appeal allowed in part | Partial | Lee Jwee Nguan of Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Teo Sew Eng | Appellant | Individual | Appeal allowed in part | Partial |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Choo Han Teck | J | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Lee Jwee Nguan | Attorney-General’s Chambers |
Sunil Sudheesan | KhattarWong |
Subhas Anandan | KhattarWong |
4. Facts
- The Appellant pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting her son to commit mischief by fire.
- The offence arose from a family dispute over money withheld from the appellant and her son.
- The appellant provided her son with charcoal, petrol, and cloth to set fire to Dorothy's car.
- The son and his classmate set fire to Dorothy's car, causing $40,500 in damages.
- A second car was damaged, with damages assessed at $25,000.
- The son and his classmate received probation sentences.
5. Formal Citations
- Teo Sew Eng v Public Prosecutor, MA 189/2008, [2009] SGHC 88
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Louis's father died | |
Louis and Ho set fire to Dorothy's car | |
Case Number MA 189/2008 | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Sentencing for aiding and abetting mischief by fire
- Outcome: The High Court reduced the appellant's sentence from six months to two months imprisonment.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Appeal against sentence
9. Cause of Actions
- Aiding and abetting mischief by fire
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Appeals
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed) s 435 | Singapore |
Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed) s 109 | Singapore |
Penal Code s 34 | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Mischief by fire
- Aiding and abetting
- Family dispute
- Probation
- Sentencing appeal
15.2 Keywords
- mischief by fire
- aiding and abetting
- sentencing
- criminal law
- family dispute
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Mischief by Fire | 95 |
Sentencing | 90 |
Criminal Procedure | 90 |
Arson | 85 |
Criminal Law | 80 |
Aiding and Abetting | 75 |
Penal Code | 70 |
Family Dispute | 65 |
Criminal Revision | 60 |
Psychiatry | 40 |
Children's Welfare | 30 |
Fraud and Deceit | 20 |
Contract Law | 10 |
Torts | 10 |
Personal Injury | 10 |
16. Subjects
- Criminal Law
- Sentencing
- Appeals