Teo Sew Eng v Public Prosecutor: Aiding and Abetting Mischief by Fire in Family Dispute

In Teo Sew Eng v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of Singapore reviewed the sentence of Teo Sew Eng, who was convicted of aiding and abetting her son in committing mischief by fire. The case arose from a family dispute over withheld funds. The High Court, while acknowledging the seriousness of the offense, reduced Teo Sew Eng's imprisonment term from six months to two months, considering the probation sentences given to the principal offenders and the context of the family dispute.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal allowed in part

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment reserved

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Teo Sew Eng was convicted of aiding and abetting her son's mischief by fire due to a family dispute. The High Court reduced her sentence from six to two months.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal allowed in partPartial
Lee Jwee Nguan of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Teo Sew EngAppellantIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Lee Jwee NguanAttorney-General’s Chambers
Sunil SudheesanKhattarWong
Subhas AnandanKhattarWong

4. Facts

  1. The Appellant pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting her son to commit mischief by fire.
  2. The offence arose from a family dispute over money withheld from the appellant and her son.
  3. The appellant provided her son with charcoal, petrol, and cloth to set fire to Dorothy's car.
  4. The son and his classmate set fire to Dorothy's car, causing $40,500 in damages.
  5. A second car was damaged, with damages assessed at $25,000.
  6. The son and his classmate received probation sentences.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Teo Sew Eng v Public Prosecutor, MA 189/2008, [2009] SGHC 88

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Louis's father died
Louis and Ho set fire to Dorothy's car
Case Number MA 189/2008
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Sentencing for aiding and abetting mischief by fire
    • Outcome: The High Court reduced the appellant's sentence from six months to two months imprisonment.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Aiding and abetting mischief by fire

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Appeals

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed) s 435Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed) s 109Singapore
Penal Code s 34Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Mischief by fire
  • Aiding and abetting
  • Family dispute
  • Probation
  • Sentencing appeal

15.2 Keywords

  • mischief by fire
  • aiding and abetting
  • sentencing
  • criminal law
  • family dispute

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Appeals