Eugene Lee

Eugene Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 31 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 77.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 6% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eugene Lee has demonstrated expertise across 69 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	26 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 26 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	23 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 23 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Evidence	12 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	12 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	11 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Aggravated Rape	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault by penetration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation Plea	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside adjudication determination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegal importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Defence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Kidnapping	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Consumption	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Suffocation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Power	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mischief by Fire	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Attempted Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
False Report	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Bully	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Weapons Charges	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Incorporation by reference	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eugene Lee has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 20 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	20 cases	65% of cases	Toh Sia Guan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Murder Conviction Under Penal Code s 300(c)(Feb 2021) Public Prosecutor v BMU: Sexual Assault by Penetration Sentencing(Oct 2020) BRJ v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Outrage of Modesty of a Child(Mar 2020)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	5 cases	16% of cases	Martinez v. Public Prosecutor: Criminal Defamation & Public Prosecutor's Discretion(Mar 2011) Public Prosecutor v MX: Sentencing for Rape and Aggravated Rape of Daughters(Apr 2006) PP v Sundarti Supriyanto: Culpable Homicide Sentencing Considerations(Oct 2004)
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	2 cases	6% of cases	Zainal bin Hamad v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2018) Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd v Samsung C&T Corp: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Building and Construction Dispute(Dec 2017)
Chris Chong & CT Ho Partnership	2 cases	6% of cases	PP v Zhou Jian Guang: Kidnapping for Ransom - Sentencing of Accomplices(Apr 2000) Chin Siong Kian v PP: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Amendment of Charges(Feb 2000)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	BZV v BZW: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Apr 2021)
Holborn Law LLC	1 cases	3% of cases	Bintai Kindenko v Samsung C&T: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability Exception(May 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eugene Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 2 (6%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.8 parties avg	2.8	13%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	3%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Won	242.2 parties avg	2.2	77%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	62.3 parties avg	2.3
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2016	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eugene Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(13%)	13%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	2(6%)	6%
Won	24(77%)	77%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	40,000.00	10,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	6 15	Neutral: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 5 cases (83.3%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 31 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BZV v BZW: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 04 Apr 2021 BZX (Defendant)Lost	04 Apr 2021	BZX (Defendant): Claim DismissedApplication allowed and the award set aside in so far as it dismisses the plaintiff's claim. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Toh Sia Guan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Murder Conviction Under Penal Code s 300(c) 01 Feb 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Feb 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction and sentence.
3	Public Prosecutor v BMU: Sexual Assault by Penetration Sentencing 27 Oct 2020 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Oct 2020	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 22 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
4	BRJ v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Outrage of Modesty of a Child 22 Mar 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 Mar 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed, upholding the original sentence.
5	Bintai Kindenko v Samsung C&T: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability Exception 29 May 2019 Samsung C&T Corporation (Respondent)Won	29 May 2019	Samsung C&T Corporation (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Appellant to pay the First Respondent’s costs fixed at $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), which included the disbursements and the costs of the application to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal.
6	Zainal bin Hamad v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Oct 2018 Rahmat Bin Karimon (Appellant)Lost	02 Oct 2018	Rahmat Bin Karimon (Appellant): Appeal dismissedRahmat's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
7	PP v Fazali Bin Mohamed: Trafficking in Cannabis and Cannabis Mixture under the Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Jan 2018 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Jan 2018	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on two charges of trafficking in cannabis and cannabis mixture.
8	Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd v Samsung C&T Corp: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Building and Construction Dispute 18 Dec 2017 Samsung C&T Corp (Respondent, Applicant)Won	18 Dec 2017	Samsung C&T Corp (Respondent, Applicant): Application AllowedSamsung's application to set aside the Adjudication Determination was allowed, with costs of $10,000 to be paid by Bintai to Samsung (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Oct 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	19 Oct 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as chargedAll three accused were found guilty as charged.
10	Public Prosecutor v Shanmuga Nathan Balakrishnan: Illegally Importing Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 15 May 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	15 May 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was convicted.
11	Public Prosecutor v Govindasamy: Culpable Homicide Conviction for Death by Fire 18 Apr 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	18 Apr 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialThe accused was not found guilty of murder, but was found guilty of culpable homicide.
12	Public Prosecutor v Lim Hou Peng Jackson: Culpable Homicide and Drug Consumption 03 Apr 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Apr 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction and sentencingAccused was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment and caning. No monetary amount was awarded.
13	PP v Khartik Jasudass: Trafficking Diamorphine - Common Intention & Knowledge of Drugs 02 Aug 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	02 Aug 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe Prosecution successfully convicted both accused persons on the charge of drug trafficking.
14	PP v Ng Kean Meng Terence: Statutory Rape and Sexual Penetration of a Minor 24 Jun 2015 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	24 Jun 2015	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 14 years’ imprisonment and 14 strokes of the cane.
15	PP v Mohd Jeefrey: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Nov 2014 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Nov 2014	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was found guilty as charged.
16	PP v Low Chuan Wee Anthony: Rape & Indecent Acts with a Minor - Abuse of Trust 30 Nov 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Nov 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of all seven charges.
17	Muhammad Faizal v PP: Motor Vehicle Act & Special Reasons Exception 03 Oct 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Oct 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's position was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
18	Public Prosecutor v Wang Wenfeng: Murder, Armed Robbery, Penal Code 19 Sep 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	19 Sep 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty of murder.
19	Public Prosecutor v Tan Teck Soon: Culpable Homicide and Sentencing 25 May 2011 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 May 2011	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was convicted and sentenced to 14 years' imprisonment.
20	Kwek Seow Hock v PP: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Defence of Consumption 06 Apr 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	06 Apr 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
21	Martinez v. Public Prosecutor: Criminal Defamation & Public Prosecutor's Discretion 06 Mar 2011 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Neutral	06 Mar 2011	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Nolle Prosequi EnteredThe Public Prosecutor entered a nolle prosequi, discontinuing the charges against the second respondent.
22	Public Prosecutor v MX: Sentencing for Rape and Aggravated Rape of Daughters 17 Apr 2006 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	17 Apr 2006	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 32 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
23	PP v Sundarti Supriyanto: Culpable Homicide Sentencing Considerations 28 Oct 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Oct 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence of life imprisonment imposedThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment.
24	PP v Sundarti Supriyanto: Culpable Homicide & Provocation Defense 23 Sep 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	23 Sep 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Charge of murder reduced to culpable homicideThe initial charge of murder was reduced to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
25	Public Prosecutor v Ismail: Arms Offences Act - Intent to Cause Injury 18 Nov 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Nov 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was found guilty and convicted as charged.
26	Public Prosecutor v I and K: Sexual Assault and False Police Report Case 04 Aug 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Aug 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused were found guilty and sentenced.
27	Public Prosecutor v Ramli bin Ismail: Trafficking of Diamorphine 05 Nov 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	05 Nov 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was convicted as charged.
28	Public Prosecutor v. Yeoh Aik Wei: Drug Importation - Woodlands Checkpoint 23 Sep 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	23 Sep 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused.
29	Wong Sin Yee v Public Prosecutor: Compounding Offences, Criminal References, and Sentencing for Road Bully Offence 22 May 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	22 May 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was increased.
30	PP v Zhou Jian Guang: Kidnapping for Ransom - Sentencing of Accomplices 26 Apr 2000 Shi Song Jing (Defendant)Lost	26 Apr 2000	Shi Song Jing (Defendant): Life ImprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment, deemed to have commenced from the date of arrest, 14 September 1999.
31	Chin Siong Kian v PP: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Amendment of Charges 11 Feb 2000 Chin Siong Kian (Appellant)Lost	11 Feb 2000	Chin Siong Kian (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence for drug trafficking was dismissed.