Similar fact evidence
Similar fact evidence is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 13 cases from 2003 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Similar fact evidence, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Attorney-General’s Chambers80.00% success rate | 5 cases38.5% of area |
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Deputy Public Prosecutor50.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Chooi Jing Yen LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Providence Law Asia LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Andre Jumabhoy LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Arbiters Inc Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Ramesh Tiwary0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Advox Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Parwani Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Similar fact evidence, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam0.00% success rate | 2 cases15.4% of area |
Chooi Jing Yen0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Andre Darius Jumabhoy0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Wuan Kin Lek Nicholas100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Cheah Wenjie100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Koh Yi Wen100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Jiang Ke-Yue100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Aristotle Emmanuel Eng Zhen Yang0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Mohammad Shafiq bin Haja Maideen0.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Anparasan s/o Kamachi100.00% success rate | 1 cases7.7% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 13 most recent judgments out of 13 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PP v Soh Jing Zhe: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Similar Fact Evidence | General Division of the High Court | 30 Dec 2024 | Both accused convicted. |
2 | - | 03 Nov 2024 | Unknown | |
3 | Public Prosecutor v JCS: Statutory Rape, Sexual Penetration of a Minor, and Rioting | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 03 Jul 2024 | Appeal Allowed |
4 | - | 18 Apr 2022 | Unknown | |
5 | Pilgrim v Asian Appraisal: Negligence in Asset Valuation and Loan Security | General Division of the High Court | 16 Jan 2022 | Plaintiff's claims dismissed. |
6 | Raymond Soh Tian Khoon v Public Prosecutor: Application for Disclosure and Witness Recall in Customs Act Charges | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 14 Mar 2019 | Criminal motion dismissed regarding the recall of witnesses. |
7 | BLV v Public Prosecutor: Adducing Fresh Evidence, Abuse of Process, False Evidence | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 20 Jan 2019 | Original verdict upheld; new evidence rejected; finding of abuse of process. |
8 | PP v Mohd Ariffan: Adducing Fresh Evidence on Appeal in Sexual Offence Case | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 13 Feb 2018 | The Prosecution's application to admit the affidavits of Matin, Superintendent Chua, and Assistant Superintendent Jaga was dismissed. The application to admit the evidence of Ms. Ng was allowed in part. Ms. Ng's affidavit, section 7, and paragraphs 5.3.4 and 5.5 of the expert report are admitted as further evidence in this appeal. |
9 | Ramesh v AXA Life: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Employer References | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 26 Jul 2016 | Appeal Allowed in Part |
10 | World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & Defamation | High Court | 09 Apr 2013 | Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1. |
11 | Yu Eng Chin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence for Molestation | High Court | 08 Mar 2009 | Appeal dismissed. |
12 | Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth v Tan Chor Chuan: Review of Costs in Defamation Action | High Court | 09 Nov 2005 | The court decided that it did not have the power to allow a further reduction on account of the failed defenses. The court also decided that, even if it were open to it to grant a reduction, no reduction ought to be allowed. |
13 | Tan Mui Teck v Public Prosecutor: False Evidence, Conflicting Expert Testimony & Sentencing | High Court | 24 Jul 2003 | Appellant’s appeal against conviction dismissed; Appellant’s appeal against sentence allowed; Public Prosecutor’s appeal against sentence dismissed. |