Qabir Singh Sandhu

Qabir Singh Sandhu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 18 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and forum non conveniens. Their track record shows a 28.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 39% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated expertise across 99 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	17 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice19% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reflective Loss Principle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Emergency Interim Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Emergency Arbitrator	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Post-termination provisions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Entire Agreement Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Transfer Restrictions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
IT Key Man Dependency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Policy Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Plans	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cause of action estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Calderbank Offer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Qabir Singh Sandhu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Qabir Singh Sandhu has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 17 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
LVM Law Chambers LLC	17 cases	94% of cases	Tan Wei Heng Kelvin v Tok Beng Tong: Forum Non Conveniens in Investment Dispute(Dec 2023) Tan Siew Hui v Lim Lai Soon: Beneficial Ownership of Shares in Family-Owned Companies(Oct 2023) Kwek Hong Lim v Kwek Sum Chuan: Oral Contract Dispute over Supermarket Shares and Property(Mar 2023)
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	6% of cases	L Capital Jones Ltd v Maniach Pte Ltd: Arbitrability of Minority Oppression Claims & O 57 r 9A(5) Interpretation(Jan 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Qabir Singh Sandhu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 7 (39%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	83.9 parties avg	3.9	44%
Partial	43.0 parties avg	3.0	22%
Withdrawn	14.0 parties avg	4.0	6%
Won	55.0 parties avg	5.0	28%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	54.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	64.1 parties avg	4.1
2023	44.4 parties avg	4.4

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Qabir Singh Sandhu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(44%)	44%
Partial	4(22%)	22%
Withdrawn	1(6%)	6%
Won	5(28%)	28%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,366,645.48	151,849.509 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	5 311	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	6 312	Lost: 3 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 2 cases (33.3%)
2023	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 18 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Wei Heng Kelvin v Tok Beng Tong: Forum Non Conveniens in Investment Dispute 11 Dec 2023 Langgeng Sugiarto (Claimant, Respondent)Lost	11 Dec 2023	Langgeng Sugiarto (Claimant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the claimant is responsible for paying the costs of the application in SUM 2259 fixed at S$9,000 (all-in) and the costs of the appeal in RA 193 fixed at S$12,000 (all-in). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tan Siew Hui v Lim Lai Soon: Beneficial Ownership of Shares in Family-Owned Companies 09 Oct 2023 Lim Lai Soon (Respondent)Won	09 Oct 2023	Lim Lai Soon (Respondent): Orders upheld in entiretyThe Judge’s orders were upheld in entirety in these appeals.
3	Kwek Hong Lim v Kwek Sum Chuan: Oral Contract Dispute over Supermarket Shares and Property 22 Mar 2023 Kwek Sum Chuan (Defendant)Won	22 Mar 2023	Kwek Sum Chuan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim against the defendant.
4	Terigi v Hook: Breach of Contract, Share Transfer, and Employment Agreement Dispute 25 Jan 2023 Incomlend Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	25 Jan 2023	Incomlend Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; Mr. Hook breached the 1st Shareholders’ Deed. Awarded S$30,000 inclusive of disbursements in costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lim Lai Soon v Tan Hong Sin: Beneficial Ownership of Shares & Patents Dispute 17 Nov 2022 Lim Lai Soon (Plaintiff)Won	17 Nov 2022	Lim Lai Soon (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPlaintiff's claim for beneficial ownership of shares was substantially successful.
6	CVG v CVH: Enforcement of Emergency Interim Award and Interpretation of International Arbitration Act 06 Oct 2022 CVH (Defendant)Won	06 Oct 2022	CVH (Defendant): Application GrantedDefendant's application to set aside the Enforcement Order was granted, and the claimant was ordered to pay costs to the defendant fixed at $16,000 plus disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Wei Ho-Hung v Lyu Jun: Appeal on Gifts, Resulting Trusts, and Quistclose Trusts in Unmarried Couple's Dispute 18 Aug 2022 Lyu Jun (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	18 Aug 2022	Lyu Jun (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment varied in partJudgment varied to reduce the amount Wei Ho-Hung was ordered to repay by S$40,000. Costs of S$45,000 awarded to Lyu Jun.
8	Oni Global Pte Ltd v Wong Yong Kai: Conspiracy Claim & Service Out of Jurisdiction 08 Jun 2022 Oni Global Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	08 Jun 2022	Oni Global Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal against the decision to set aside the leave to serve out of jurisdiction was dismissed.
9	Thio Keng Thay v Sandy Island Pte Ltd: Damages for Breach of Sale and Purchase Agreement 30 Mar 2022 Sandy Island Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	30 Mar 2022	Sandy Island Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant in the sum of $1,308,645.48. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Terigi v Hook: Entire Agreement Clauses & Share Transfer Dispute in Singapore 24 Jan 2022 Incomlend Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	24 Jan 2022	Incomlend Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
11	Oxley Consortium v Geetex Enterprises: Interpretation of Standard Form Contract under Sale of Commercial Properties Act 27 Jul 2021 Geetex Enterprises Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	27 Jul 2021	Geetex Enterprises Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal dismissed in part; the court answered the first four questions of law in favor of the respondent. The respondent is entitled to a refund of progress payments for Unit 1 and Unit 2 as claimed in the schedule to the award, together with the prescribed interest.
12	Terrence Fernandez v Genevieve Lim: Defamation, Conspiracy, and Harassment Suit 29 Dec 2020 Serangoon Gardens Country Club (Third Party)Withdrawn	29 Dec 2020	Serangoon Gardens Country Club (Third Party): Claim WithdrawnThe claim and counterclaim against Goh Juak Kin were discontinued.
13	Silverlink Resorts v MS First Capital: Scope of Arbitration Agreement & Stay of Proceedings 15 Nov 2020 MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	15 Nov 2020	MS First Capital Insurance Limited (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe defendant's appeal seeking a stay of proceedings in favour of arbitration was dismissed. The court ordered that the defendant pay to the plaintiff the costs of the appeal fixed at $6,000 plus disbursements, to be fixed by me if not agreed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
14	Oxley Consortium v Geetex: Recourse Against Award & Appeal Under Arbitration Act 04 Nov 2020 Geetex Enterprises Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	04 Nov 2020	Geetex Enterprises Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	CKR Contract Services v Asplenium Land: Res Judicata & Striking Out in Construction Dispute 28 Jun 2020 CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Jun 2020	CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claims in conspiracy struck outPlaintiff's claims in conspiracy against the first defendant are struck out in their totality.
16	CKR Contract Services v Asplenium Land: Appeal on Arbitral Award under Arbitration Act 26 Apr 2020 CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Apr 2020	CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedCKR's application for leave to appeal the arbitral award was dismissed.
17	Thio Keng Thay v Sandy Island Pte Ltd: Construction Defects, Breach of Contract, Defamation 25 Jul 2019 Sandy Island Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Partial	25 Jul 2019	Sandy Island Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Breach of contract claim lost in partJudgment against the Defendant on the breach of contract claim, with the quantum of damages to be determined at a later stage. The court found that the defendant breached the SPA because the Property contained both general defects and lift defects. Monetary amount to be determined in the second tranche of the trial. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	L Capital Jones Ltd v Maniach Pte Ltd: Arbitrability of Minority Oppression Claims & O 57 r 9A(5) Interpretation 08 Jan 2017 Jones the Grocer Group Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	08 Jan 2017	Jones the Grocer Group Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs reserved to the court hearing the oppression action (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).