Duty of full and frank disclosure
Duty of full and frank disclosure is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 5 cases from 2015 to 2021.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Duty of full and frank disclosure, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
WongPartnership LLP33.33% success rate | 3 cases60.0% of area |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases40.0% of area |
Legal Clinic LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Premier Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Essex Court Chambers Duxton (Singapore Practice Group)100.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Rodyk & Davidson LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Providence Law Asia LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Duty of full and frank disclosure, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Goh Wei Wei50.00% success rate | 2 cases40.0% of area |
Wendy Lin50.00% success rate | 2 cases40.0% of area |
Kelvin Poon0.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Toh Kian Sing0.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Jonathan Lim Shi Cao0.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
John Seow0.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Nakul Dewan0.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Toh Jia Yi0.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Kam Su Cheun Aurill100.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Colin Liew100.00% success rate | 1 cases20.0% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 5 most recent judgments out of 5 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | National Oilwell Varco Norway AS v Keppel FELS: Setting Aside Leave to Enforce Arbitration Award Due to Non-Existent Party | General Division of the High Court | 10 Jun 2021 | Application allowed; plaintiff's leave to enforce the award set aside. |
2 | Tamar Perry v Bonnet Esculier: Interpleader, Striking Out, Pleadings Amendment in Offshore Case | Singapore International Commercial Court | 29 Oct 2020 | Application to strike out the unjust enrichment claim succeeded. Leave to amend the Writ and Statement of Claim was not granted in certain respects. The case was designated as an Offshore case. |
3 | Kernel Oil Pte Ltd v Iman Djuniardi: Dispute over Loan Agreements & Forum Non Conveniens | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 22 Mar 2020 | Appeal Dismissed |
4 | BRQ v BRS: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Cost Overrun & BPTA Charges | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 17 Nov 2019 | Both applications dismissed, thereby leaving the award intact. |
5 | Big Port Service DMCC v China Shipping: Wrongful Arrest & Agency in Bunker Supply Dispute | High Court | 10 Aug 2015 | Striking-Out Application allowed; Stay Application dismissed. |