Tan Kok Meng v Public Prosecutor: Unsoundness of Mind and Causation in Murder

Tan Kok Meng appealed the High Court's finding under s 251 of the Criminal Procedure Code that he caused his father's death. He was originally charged with murder under s 300(a) of the Penal Code, but the defense of unsoundness of mind under s 84 of the Penal Code was accepted. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, affirming that Tan Kok Meng committed the act of causing his father's death.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding a murder charge where the defendant was of unsound mind. The court affirmed the finding that the defendant caused the victim's death.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondent, PlaintiffGovernment AgencyFinding AffirmedWon
Daphne Lim of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Yang Ziliang of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Tan Kok MengAppellant, DefendantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJustice of the Court of AppealYes
Tay Yong KwangJustice of the Court of AppealNo
Chao Hick TinSenior JudgeNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Daphne LimAttorney-General’s Chambers
Yang ZiliangAttorney-General’s Chambers
Kang Kok Boon, FavianPeter Low & Choo LLC
Yuen Ai Zhen CarolPeter Low & Choo LLC

4. Facts

  1. The appellant resided with his parents in their HDB flat.
  2. On the day of the incident, the appellant's mother observed that he was not his usual self.
  3. The appellant's mother told the deceased to keep watch over the appellant and not allow him to go out.
  4. The appellant's mother found the deceased lying supine on the floor with his head in a pool of blood.
  5. The appellant was seated on the sofa facing the deceased’s body.
  6. The appellant straddled the deceased and placed his hands on the deceased’s upper chest.
  7. The appellant continued to strangle the deceased while mumbling “wo yao ta shi” (“I want him to die” in Mandarin).

5. Formal Citations

  1. Tan Kok Meng v Public Prosecutor, Criminal Appeal No 37 of 2020, [2021] SGCA 55

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Incident occurred; victim died
Amendment to s 84 PC took effect
Criminal Case No 23 of 2020
Appeal dismissed
Appeal dismissed
Grounds of decision issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Unsoundness of Mind
    • Outcome: The court affirmed the finding that the appellant committed the act of causing the deceased's death, but was of unsound mind at the time of the offense.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Causation
    • Outcome: The court found that the appellant's actions caused the death of the deceased.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. No remedies sought

9. Cause of Actions

  • Murder

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Appeals

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 300(a)Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 84Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed) s 251Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed) s 252(1)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Unsoundness of mind
  • Causation
  • Strangulation
  • Aspiration of blood
  • Mercedes Laceration
  • Actus reus
  • Mens rea

15.2 Keywords

  • murder
  • unsound mind
  • causation
  • criminal law
  • singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Mental Health Law