Defective consent of Public Prosecutor

Defective consent of Public Prosecutor is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 16 cases from 2000 to 2021.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Defective consent of Public Prosecutor, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Attorney-General’s Chambers40.00% success rate10 cases62.5% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP50.00% success rate2 cases12.5% of area
Deputy Public Prosecutor100.00% success rate2 cases12.5% of area
Dew Chambers0.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area
Independent Practitioner0.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area
Providence Law Asia LLC0.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area
Peter Low & Choo LLC0.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC0.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area
Leo Fernando LLC0.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Defective consent of Public Prosecutor, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Charlene Tay Chia0.00% success rate2 cases12.5% of area
Sharmila Sripathy-Shanaz0.00% success rate2 cases12.5% of area
Michael Quilindo0.00% success rate2 cases12.5% of area
Daphne Lim100.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area
Daniel Koh100.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area
Ramesh Tiwary0.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area
Kang Kok Boon, Favian0.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area
Afzal Ali100.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area
Tai Wei Shyong100.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area
Leong Wen Jia Nicholas0.00% success rate1 cases6.3% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 16 most recent judgments out of 16 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Rajendran v Public Prosecutor: Women's Charter, PHTA & Penal Code OffencesGeneral Division of the High Court24 Aug 2021
Appeal Allowed in Part
2VKC v VJZ: Anti-Suit Injunction & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Estate DisputeCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore28 Jul 2021
Appeal Dismissed
3Tan Kok Meng v Public Prosecutor: Unsoundness of Mind and Causation in MurderCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore17 May 2021
Appeal Dismissed
4Chander Kumar v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application for Drug Trafficking ConvictionCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore17 Jan 2021
Application dismissed summarily.
5-29 Jun 2020
Unknown
6Public Prosecutor v Wee Teong Boo: Rape, Sexual Assault, Outrage of ModestyHigh Court29 Aug 2019
Accused acquitted on rape charge, convicted of sexual assault by penetration and outrage of modesty.
7Public Prosecutor v Ridhaudin Ridhwan: Rape, Attempted Rape, Sexual Penetration, Outrage of Modesty, Consent, Mistake of FactHigh Court22 Apr 2019
Accused 1 convicted on all charges; Accused 2 convicted on one charge and acquitted on another; Accused 3 convicted on all charges.
8PP v Mohd Ariffan: Adducing Fresh Evidence on Appeal in Sexual Offence CaseCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore13 Feb 2018
The Prosecution's application to admit the affidavits of Matin, Superintendent Chua, and Assistant Superintendent Jaga was dismissed. The application to admit the evidence of Ms. Ng was allowed in part. Ms. Ng's affidavit, section 7, and paragraphs 5.3.4 and 5.5 of the expert report are admitted as further evidence in this appeal.
9Public Prosecutor v BPK: Attempted Murder & ProvocationHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore13 Feb 2018
Accused convicted on the charge of attempted murder.
10Pram Nair v Public Prosecutor: Rape, Intoxication, and ConsentCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore24 Sep 2017
Appeal dismissed in part. Conviction affirmed. Sentence for rape affirmed; sentence for digital penetration reduced.
11Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act OffencesHigh Court15 Jul 2015
Appeal allowed in part. The imprisonment terms for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges were replaced with an imprisonment term of four months for each of these three Proceeded Charges. The imprisonment terms for the Third Proceeded Charge and the Fifth Proceeded Charge are to run consecutively, making a total imprisonment term of eight months for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges. The fines imposed by the Sentencing Judge for all five Proceeded Charges as well as the default imprisonment terms in respect of those fines were upheld.
12Public Prosecutor v Shamsul bin Sa’at: Aggravated Rape, Sexual Assault, and HousebreakingHigh Court29 Apr 2010
Accused sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of 25 years and 24 strokes of the cane.
13Public Prosecutor v UI: Sentencing for Rape of a Minor & Use of Sentencing PrecedentsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore04 Aug 2008
Appeal Allowed
14Md Anverdeen Basheer Ahmed v PP: Rioting with Deadly Weapons & Criminal IntimidationHigh Court17 Oct 2004
Appeals dismissed.
15Louis Pius Gilbert v PP: Grievous Hurt, Provocation, & Sentence EnhancementHigh Court12 Dec 2002
Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentence enhanced to ten years' imprisonment.
16Rizal bin Abdul Razak v Public Prosecutor: Rape and Abetment of RapeHigh Court23 Jul 2000
Appeal dismissed.